Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts on age-related macular degeneration health care: a cross-sectional quantification of the adherence to CONSORT abstract reporting recommendations

16 references·4 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2,165 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,871 cited
2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
2013A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature193 cited
2012Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals140 cited
2008The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

133 cited

2010Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals89 cited

2014Improvement in the quality of abstracts in major clinical journals since CONSORT extension for abstracts: A systematic review77 cited

2014Oncology trial abstracts showed suboptimal improvement in reporting: a comparative before-and-after evaluation using CONSORT for Abstract guidelines76 cited

Cited by

2019Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts presented at the SLEEP Annual Meetings: a cross-sectional study20 cited
2023Reporting quality of abstracts from randomised controlled trials published in leading critical care nursing journals: a methodological quality review14 cited
2022Reporting quality for abstracts of randomised trials on child and adolescent depression prevention: a meta-epidemiological study on adherence to CONSORT for abstracts13 cited
2022Did an introduction of CONSORT for abstracts guidelines improve reporting quality of randomised controlled trials’ abstracts on Helicobacter pylori infection? Observational study12 cited