Peer Review and Citation Data in Predicting University Rankings, a Large-Scale AnalysisDavid Pride, Petr Knoth2018-01-01otherLecture notes in computer science20 citationsgreenNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsWeb visibility and informetricsAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.References2011Performance-based university research funding systems2012Bias in peer review2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals2010Testing for the Presence of Positive-Outcome Bias in Peer Review2016Building on success and learning from experience: an independent review of the Research Excellence Framework2003Impartial Judgment by the “Gatekeepers” of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process2017The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a universityCited by2020The inconsistency of h-index: A mathematical analysis2020On the agreement between bibliometrics and peer review: Evidence from the Italian research assessment exercises