SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in CMI
4 references·2 citing·29 second hop
Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in CMI (2018)Systematic reviews of diagnostic test acc…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for…Bayesian meta‐analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards (2013)Bayesian meta‐analysis of dia…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …Living systematic reviews: aims and standards (2023)Living systematic reviews: ai…Being a CMI editor (2019)Being a CMI editorBias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence (2013)Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study (2014)Latent Class Analysis (1987)The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance (2003)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Bayesian meta‐analysis of test accuracy in the absence of a perfect reference test applied to bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (2015)bamdit: An R Package for Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Data (2018)Meta‐analysis of dichotomous and ordinal tests with an imperfect gold standard (2022)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The CMI welcomes systematic reviews (2016)What can we learn from our peer reviewers (2017)What are our aims at CMI? (2018)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,549 cited
  • 2018Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies3,255 cited
  • 2023Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy770 cited
  • 2013Bayesian meta‐analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards38 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Living systematic reviews: aims and standards8 cited
  • 2019Being a CMI editor7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work