Uncertainty Analysis of Flood Control Measures Including Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainties: Probability Theory and Evidence Theory

Masoume Behrouz · Saeed Alimohammadi

24 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Hydrologic Engineering

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis Risk and Safety Analysis

Abstract

Encountering uncertainty in engineering design problems is inevitable. Probability theory is a traditional method for uncertainty analysis despite the nature of uncertainties (i.e., aleatory or epistemic). Because of some limitations of probability theory in analyzing epistemic uncertainty, new methods such as evidence theory have been developed. This paper describes the analysis of uncertainty by means of both probability and evidence theories. Monte Carlo simulation is used along with the two theories to propagate the uncertainty. A computational strategy based on random sampling is used to analyze and represent the epistemic and aleatory uncertainty. Despite its advantage, the application of evidence theory in civil engineering is limited because of its mathematical complexities. This paper attempts to make this theory more applicable by using practical design problems, as well as by highlighting its advantages compared with probability theory. Three hypothetical flood-control-related problems are considered. The uncertainty of a design storm intensity resulting from an experimental equation and a design discharge resulting from the rational method are analyzed assuming storm intensity as a stochastic variable with Level 2 (i.e., both aleatory and epistemic) uncertainties. The design diameter of the pipes in a stormwater collection system is estimated. It is assumed that the input parameters have only epistemic uncertainty. The results show that if the desired risk changes, some diameters may stay fixed and some may change. The design of a flood control levee is considered. The levee height is an output variable, and it is assumed that the design discharge has Level 2 uncertainty, whereas all other inputs have epistemic uncertainty. The results of uncertainty analysis with the two theories are represented appropriately, discussed, and compared. Compared with probability theory, evidence theory offers more insight for decision makers when they encounter epistemic and/ or aleatory uncertainties in design problems.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.

References

1965Fuzzy sets 1981On The Quantitative Definition of Risk 1993Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal 1994Propagation of Uncertainty in Risk Assessments: The Need to Distinguish Between Uncertainty Due to Lack of Knowledge and Uncertainty Due to Variability 2004An exploration of alternative approaches to the representation of uncertainty in model predictions 2004Uncertainty quantification using evidence theory in multidisciplinary design optimization 2004An approximation approach for uncertainty quantification using evidence theory 2004Epistemic uncertainty quantification techniques including evidence theory for large-scale structures

Cited by

2019The Negation of Basic Probability Assignment 2020An Improved Belief Entropy in Evidence Theory 2021A new distance-based total uncertainty measure in Dempster-Shafer evidence theory

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.