Comparing the International Knowledge Flow of China’s Wind and Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Industries: Patent Analysis and Implications for Sustainable Development

Yuan Joseph Zhou · Frauke Urban

39 citations0/0 files storedSustainability

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Intellectual Property and Patents scientometrics and bibliometrics research Innovation and Knowledge Management

Abstract

Climate-relevant technologies, like wind and solar energy, are crucial for mitigating climate change and for achieving sustainable development. Recent literature argues that Chinese solar firms play more active roles in international knowledge flows, which may better explain their success in international markets when compared to those of Chinese wind firms; however, empirical evidence remains sparse. This study aims to explore to what extent and how do the international knowledge flows differ between China’s wind and solar photovoltaic (PV) industries? From a network perspective, this paper develops a three-dimensional framework to compare the knowledge flows in both explicit and tacit dimensions: (i) inter-country explicit knowledge clusters (by topological clustering of patent citation network); (ii) inter-firm explicit knowledge flow (patent citation network of key firms); and, (iii) inter-firm tacit knowledge flow (by desktop research and interviews). The results show that China’s PV industry has stronger international knowledge linkages in terms of knowledge clustering and explicit knowledge flow, but the wind power industry has a stronger tacit knowledge flow. Further, this study argues that the differences of global knowledge links between China’s wind and solar PV industries may be caused by technology characteristics, market orientation, and policy implementation. This suggests that these industries both have strong connections to global knowledge networks, but they may involve disparate catch-up pathways that concern follower-modes and leader-modes. These findings are important to help us understand how China can follow sustainable development pathways in the light of climate change.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 39 citations exist upstream.

References

2005The governance of global value chains 1990Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey 2008Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis 2018The Organization of Buyer-Driven Global Commodity Chains: How US Retailers Shape Overseas Production Networks 2006Complexity, networks and knowledge flow 2003Patent information for strategic technology management 1974The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks 2012Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway

Cited by

2020How many firms benefit from a window of opportunity? Knowledge spillovers, industry characteristics, and catching up in the Chinese biomass power plant industry 2020Identifying technology evolution pathways using topic variation detection based on patent data: A case study of 3D printing 2023Unveiling the cooperation dynamics in the photovoltaic technologies’ development 2018Comparing the Technology Trajectories of Solar PV and Solar Water Heaters in China: Using a Patent Lens 2020Analysis of patent documents with utility mining: a case study of wind energy technology

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.