This study examines the reasons why authors publish in ‘predatory’OAjournals. In total, 50 journals were randomly selected from Beall's list of ‘predatory’ journals. Different methods, includingWHOIStracking, were utilized to query basic information about the selected journals, including location and registrant. Then, 300 articles were randomly selected from within selected journals in various scientific fields. Authors of the selected articles were contacted and sent survey questions to complete. A grounded theory qualitative methods approach was used for data collection and analysis. The results demonstrated that most of these journals were located in the developing world, usually Asia or Africa, even when they claimed they were in theUSAorUK. Furthermore, four themes emerged after authors’ survey responses were coded, categorized, and sub‐categorized. The themes were:social identity threat, unawareness, high pressure,andlack of research proficiency. Scholars in the developing world felt that reputable Western journals might be prejudiced against them and sometimes felt more comfortable publishing in journals from the developing world. Other scholars were unaware of the reputation of the journals in which they published and would not have selected them had they known. However, some scholars said they would still have published in the same journals if their institution recognised them. The pressure to ‘publish or perish’ was another factor influencing many scholars’ decisions to publish in these fast‐turnaround journals. In some cases, researchers did not have adequate guidance and felt they lacked the knowledge of research to submit to a more reputable journal. More needs to be done by institutions and reputable journals to make researchers aware of the problem of ‘predatory’ journals.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 257 citations exist upstream.