Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Relationship between international collaboration papers and their citations from an economic perspective

16 references·16 citing·35 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1997What is research collaboration?3,134 cited
2001Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future548 cited
1978Studies in scientific collaboration543 cited
1997How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model407 cited
1979Studies in scientific collaboration402 cited
2001Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry280 cited
1998The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results268 cited
2010The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research232 cited
2011Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University’s publications217 cited
2009Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications158 cited
2013International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines149 cited
2016International collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam: an analysis of patterns and impact139 cited
2003Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and 'Periphery Effects' in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000131 cited
2002

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration

127 cited

2015Characteristics of international collaboration in sport sciences publications and its influence on citation impact59 cited

2012Relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of citations: a case study in Spanish computer science production in 2000–200952 cited

Cited by

2023The Role of International Research Collaboration and Faculty Related Factors in Publication Citations: Evidence from Lebanon28 cited
2023Measuring and characterizing international collaboration patterns in Indian scientific research27 cited
2022Internationalizing AI: evolution and impact of distance factors27 cited
2022Characteristics analysis and evaluation of discourse leading for academic journals: perspectives from multiple integration of altmetrics indicators and evaluation methods25 cited
2020Productivity trends and citation impact of different institutional collaboration patterns at the research units’ level17 cited
2020Factors related to the international research collaboration in the health area: A qualitative study15 cited
2022Patterns and impact of collaboration in China’s social sciences: cross-database comparisons between CSSCI and SSCI15 cited
2023Investigating the contribution of author- and publication-specific features to scholars’ h-index prediction12 cited
2023What does open peer review bring to scientific articles? Evidence from PLoS journals12 cited
2024On the peer review reports: does size matter?10 cited
2022A bibliometric analysis of how research collaboration influences Namibia’s research productivity and impact7 cited
2020BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION IN RUSSIAN UNIVERSITIES: COOPERATION VS INDIVIDUAL PRODUCTIVITY7 cited
2022Research Topic Specialization of Universities in Information Science and Library Science and Its Impact on Inter-University Collaboration6 cited
2021Great Power or Great Responsibility: What Is the Meaning of ‘Corresponding Authorship’ in Modern Research?6 cited
2020Thematical and Impact Differences Between National and International Collaboration on Artificial Intelligence Research5 cited
2023The expansion of team size in library and information science (LIS): Is bigger always better?5 cited