SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Inadequate diversity of information resources searched in US-affiliated systematic reviews and meta-analyses: 2005–2016
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Inadequate diversity of information resources searched in US-affiliated systematic reviews and meta-analyses: 2005–2016 (2018)Inadequate diversity of information resou…Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for…Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)Grey literature: An important…Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)Gray literature: An important…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review (2016)Reporting of Adverse Events i…PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews (2016)PRISMA harms checklist: impro…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology) (2015)Conducting systematic reviews…Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)Searching for grey literature…Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses (2012)Effect of reporting bias on m…Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions (2007)Grey literature in meta-analy…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Grey Literature in Meta-Analyses (2003)Grey Literature in Meta-Analy…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies (2021)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (2021)Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting (1999)Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations (2018)Prevalence of Anxiety in University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2021)Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews (2022)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis (2019)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies (2020)A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm (2020)Could virtual reality applications pose real risks to children and adolescents? A systematic review of ethical issues and concerns (2021)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 2018Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies3,196 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2017Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews1,453 cited
  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • 2015Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology)843 cited
  • 2013Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits814 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2007Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions598 cited
  • 2016PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews555 cited
  • 2017Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews505 cited
  • 2003Grey Literature in Meta-Analyses

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

399 cited
  • 2016Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review276 cited
  • 2012Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses254 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.