SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How Should Forensic Scientists Present Source Conclusions · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleHow Should Forensic Scientists Present Source Conclusions

William C. Thompson2018

Article2018

How Should Forensic Scientists Present Source Conclusions

William C. Thompson

23 citations·0/0 files stored·Seton Hall University eRepository (Seton Hall University)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Criminal Law and Evidence Jury Decision Making Processes

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 23 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2019How Cross‐Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors’ Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence 2022Probabilistic reporting and algorithms in forensic science: Stakeholder perspectives within the American criminal justice system 2020Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part III—Positive Predictive Value, Error Rates, and Inter‐Rater Reliability*2020The Utility of Expanded Conclusion Scales During Latent Print Examinations 2020Probabilistic reporting in criminal cases in the United States: A baseline study

Details

Year2018

Typearticle

Published2018-01-01

VenueSeton Hall University eRepository (Seton Hall University)

Languageen

Citations23

Files0 public / 0

ShelfLegal processes and jurisprudence

Identifiers

openalex_workW2806850268

Links

landingopen

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.