Unraveling Coloniality in International Relations: Knowledge, Relationality, and Strategies for Engagement
Abstract
A wide-ranging conversation has been unfolding in the past two decades on the colonial origins and legacies of international relations (IR) and the ways in which these might be overcome. Critiques and counter-projects that draw inspiration from Latin American decolonial thinking have become an increasingly prominent part of this, particularly in the past few years. In this article, I offer an assessment of this nascent decolonial IR. I make two broad arguments: that dominant modes of decolonial critique in IR need to be supplemented by projects that unravel—that is, make sense of and disrupt—racialized power and knowledge relations as they play out across multiple political, economic, and epistemic sites; and that achieving this requires more nuanced and targeted decolonial methodologies than those that are currently available. This leads me to reframe coloniality in IR as a methodological problem, not to supplant questions of epistemology, ontology, or ethics in decolonial IR but to render them more amenable to empirical analysis. Illustrating my discussion through reference to the global governance of “traditional knowledge,” I sketch out a methodological framework for decolonial IR that is attentive to the slow, context-specific processes through which coloniality (re)emerges but is also reshaped.
Cite this
Karen Tucker (2018). Unraveling Coloniality in International Relations: Knowledge, Relationality, and Strategies for Engagement. International Political Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/oly005
@article{karen2018unraveling,
title = {Unraveling Coloniality in International Relations: Knowledge, Relationality, and Strategies for Engagement},
author = {Tucker, Karen},
year = {2018},
journal = {International Political Sociology},
doi = {10.1093/ips/oly005}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 138 citations exist upstream.