SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Field-Weighting Readership: How Does It Compare to Field-Weighting Citations? · Study

WorkField-Weighting Readership: How Does It Compare to Field-Weighting Citations?

Sarah Huggett2018

OA

Workgreen2018

Field-Weighting Readership: How Does It Compare to Field-Weighting Citations?

Sarah Huggett · Chris James · Eleonora Palmaro

13 citations·0/0 files stored·Communications in computer and information science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output 1980Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities 2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicators 2014Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective 2010Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals 2014How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications 2007Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis 2013Evaluating altmetrics

Cited by

2018Altmetrics for Research Outputs Measurement and Scholarly Information Management 2022The Power Law and Emerging and Senior Scholar Publication Patterns 2023Citation Metrics and Boyer’s Model of Scholarship: How Do Bibliometrics and Altmetrics Respond to Research Impact?

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2018Altmetrics for Research Outputs Measurement and Scholarly Information Managementother · 13 shared references 2019Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometricschapter · 7 shared references 2017Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literaturearticle · 6 shared references 2015Why do papers have many Mendeley readers but few Scopus-indexed citations and vice versa?article · 6 shared references 2017Do Mendeley reader counts reflect the scholarly impact of conference papers? An investigation of computer science and engineeringarticle · 6 shared references 2015Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Managementother · 6 shared references

Details

Year2018

Typeother

Published2018-01-01

VenueCommunications in computer and information science

ISSN-L1865-0929

Languageen

Citations13

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1007/978-981-13-1053-9_8

openalex_workW2807736692

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.