SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How to: evaluate a diagnostic test · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleHow to: evaluate a diagnostic test

Mariska Leeflang2018

OA

Articlebronze2018

How to: evaluate a diagnostic test

Mariska Leeflang · Franz J. Allerberger

78 citations·0/0 files stored·Clinical Microbiology and Infection

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control Healthcare Regulation

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 78 citations exist upstream.

References

1986STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales 2015STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies 2006Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways 2009A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard 2012Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials 2002Spectrum Bias or Spectrum Effect? Subgroup Variation in Diagnostic Test Evaluation 2013Clinicians are right not to like Cohen's

Cited by

2021Rethinking PICO in the Machine Learning Era: ML-PICO 2020Submissions and publications in corona times

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2018Determining qualitative effect size ratings using a likelihood ratio scatter matrix in diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviewsreview · 4 shared references 2019Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An updatereview · 3 shared references 2019Targeted test evaluation: a framework for designing diagnostic accuracy studies with clear study hypothesesarticle · 3 shared references 2016Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studiesarticle · 3 shared references 2022STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaborationarticle · 3 shared references 2017Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 2: a review of methodological and practical challengesarticle · 3 shared references

Details

Year2018

Typearticle

Published2018-06-12

VenueClinical Microbiology and Infection

ISSN-L1198-743X

Languageen

Citations78

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.cmi.2018.06.011

openalex_workW2807995211

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.