SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal Articles as Perceived by Authors in the Educational Sciences
16 references·2 citing·43 second hop
Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal Articles as Perceived by Authors in the Educational Sciences (2018)Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal…European Science Editing (2020)European Science EditingPeer review: The current landscape and future trends (2016)Peer review: The current land…Excessively Long Editorial Decisions and Excessively Long Publication Times by Journals: Causes, Risks, Consequences, and Proposed Solutions (2016)Excessively Long Editorial De…Peer review: still king in the digital age (2014)Peer review: still king in th…Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities (2013)Views on the peer review syst…Referees' comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: when is a suggestion not a suggestion? (2013)Referees' comments on submiss…Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature (2013)Defining and Characterizing O…Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)Peer review in a changing wor…Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach (2012)Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater …The Silent Majority: Manuscript Rejection and Its Impact on Scholars (2011)The Silent Majority: Manuscri…A Troubled Tradition (2011)A Troubled TraditionPerceptions of Ethical Problems with Scientific Journal Peer Review: An Exploratory Study (2008)Perceptions of Ethical Proble…Author Perception of Peer Review (2002)Author Perception of Peer Rev…Applied ethics of program evaluation (1997)Applied ethics of program eva…Applied Ethics for Program Evaluation (1995)Applied Ethics for Program Ev…Pernicious publication practices (1981)Pernicious publication practi…Critical reflections on the journal peer review process (2024)Critical reflections on the j…Accelerated Peer Review and Paper Processing Models in Academic Publishing (2022)Accelerated Peer Review and P…Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions (2021)Speech Acts (1969)How To Do Things With Words (1975)Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage (1987)The politics of English, language and uptake (2015)Publishing Research in English as an Additional Language: Practices, Pathways and Potentials (2017)“This work is antithetical to the spirit of research”: An anatomy of harsh peer reviews (2020)Psychology of intergroup relations (1986)The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. (1995)The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior (2004)CARE AND COMPASSION THROUGH AN ORGANIZATIONAL LENS: OPENING UP NEW POSSIBILITIES. (2012)Over-Competitiveness in Academia: A Literature Review (2013)Decolonizing journals in management and organizations? Epistemological colonial encounters and the double translation (2022)Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance (1998)Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for Assessing Peer Reviews of Manuscripts (1999)How I Review an Original Scientific Article (2002)The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature (2010)Flows of Research Manuscripts Among Scientific Journals Reveal Hidden Submission Patterns (2012)Opening up BMJ peer review (1999)The politics of publication (2003)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM (2019)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution (2019)Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review (2020)The Influence of Social Presence on Students’ Satisfaction toward Online Course (2020)How blind is blind review? (1984)The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process (2009)We Have to Break Up (2009)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)Women Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review to Outline the Boundaries of Scientific Literature (2020)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Open-access mega-journals (2017)Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science (2020)Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science (2020)60th Anniversary Essay (2016)Effects of work environment and collaboration on research productivity in Vietnamese social sciences: evidence from 2008 to 2017 scopus data (2018)Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers393 cited
  • 2014Peer review: still king in the digital age243 cited
  • 2020European Science Editing148 cited
  • 2002Author Perception of Peer Review140 cited
  • 2013Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature136 cited
  • 2008Perceptions of Ethical Problems with Scientific Journal Peer Review: An Exploratory Study135 cited
  • 2011The Silent Majority: Manuscript Rejection and Its Impact on Scholars107 cited
  • 2013Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities100 cited
  • 1981Pernicious publication practices83 cited
  • 2013Referees' comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: when is a suggestion not a suggestion?82 cited
  • 2012Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach82 cited
  • 2016Peer review: The current landscape and future trends71 cited
  • 1995Applied Ethics for Program Evaluation71 cited
  • 1997Applied ethics of program evaluation66 cited
  • 2011A Troubled Tradition

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

56 cited
  • 2016Excessively Long Editorial Decisions and Excessively Long Publication Times by Journals: Causes, Risks, Consequences, and Proposed Solutions37 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Accelerated Peer Review and Paper Processing Models in Academic Publishing16 cited
    • 2024Critical reflections on the journal peer review process10 cited