SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey
9 references·16 citing·46 second hop
Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey (2018)Comprehensiveness of national bibliograph…Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries (2018)Publication patterns in the s…Publication-Based Funding: The Norwegian Model (2016)Publication-Based Funding: Th…Frascati manual 2015 : guidelines for collecting and reporting data in research and experimental development: the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. (2016)Frascati manual 2015 : guidel…Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland (2016)Assessing publications throug…Frascati Manual 2015 (2015)Frascati Manual 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Bibliometrics : Use and Abuse in the Review of Research Performance (2014)Bibliometrics : Use and Abuse…The growth of science and database coverage (2012)The growth of science and dat…Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Scie…The new knowledge production in the social sciences and in the arts and humanities in Latin America (2022)The new knowledge production …Tracing the context in disciplinary classifications: A bibliometric pairwise comparison of five classifications of journals in the social sciences and humanities (2021)Tracing the context in discip…Journal article publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A comparison of Web of Science coverage for five European countries (2021)Journal article publishing in…Citation patterns between impact-factor and questionable journals (2021)Citation patterns between imp…ВІДКРИТІ ЦИФРОВІ СИСТЕМИ В ОЦІНЮВАННІ РЕЗУЛЬТАТІВ НАУКОВО-ПЕДАГОГІЧНИХ ДОСЛІДЖЕНЬ (2020)ВІДКРИТІ ЦИФРОВІ СИСТЕМИ В ОЦ…The role of learned societies in national scholarly publishing (2020)The role of learned societies…Researchers publishing monographs are more productive and more local-oriented (2020)Researchers publishing monogr…Professional standards in bibliometric research evaluation? A meta-evaluation of European assessment practice 2005–2019 (2020)Professional standards in bib…Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers (2020)Open access at the national l…Understanding and Evaluating Research and Scholarly Publishing in the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) (2019)Understanding and Evaluating …Publication counting methods for a national research evaluation exercise (2019)Publication counting methods …Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines (2019)Journals’ instructions to aut…Identifying publications in questionable journals in the context of performance-based research funding (2019)Identifying publications in q…Developing Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) as Data Sources for Studies of Research (2019)Developing Current Research I…The Flemish Performance-based Research Funding System: A Unique Variant of the Norwegian Model (2018)The Flemish Performance-based…Applications of, and Experiences with, the Norwegian Model in Finland (2018)Applications of, and Experien…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Science and Engineering Indicators (1993)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Publication Growth in Biological Sub-Fields: Patterns, Predictability and Sustainability (2012)Retrieval strategy and possible explanations for the abnormal growth of research publications: re-evaluating a bibliometric analysis of climate change (2022)Web of Science Core Collection’s coverage expansion: the forgotten Arts & Humanities Citation Index? (2024)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (2004)The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible (2006)The Four Literatures of Social Science (2006)Performance-based resource allocation for higher education institutions in China (2018)Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting (2019)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Measuring the efficiency of decision making units (1978)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (1983)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience (2009)Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts (2002)Performance-based university research funding systems (2011)Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)The Norwegian Model in Norway (2018)Examining how country-level science policy shapes publication patterns: the case of Poland (2019)Bias in peer review (2012)Bibliometric analysis of support vector machines research trend: a case study in China (2019)Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study (2020)The System of Professions (1988)The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. (1990)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1999)Bibliometric Reports for Institutions: Best Practices in a Responsible Metrics Scenario (2021)Do researchers know what the h-index is? And how do they estimate its importance? (2021)AI and business management: Tracking future research agenda through bibliometric network analysis (2023)OECD Patent Statistics Manual (2009)OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard (2009)Reducing the precarity of academic research careers (2021)The production of social science research in Nigeria: status and systemic determinants (2022)The EU 2020 innovation indicator: A step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes? (2016)An evaluation and explanation of (in)efficiency in higher education institutions in Europe and the U.S. with the application of two-stage semi-parametric DEA (2017)Can environmental regulation promote the coordinated development of economy and environment in China’s manufacturing industry?–A panel data analysis of 28 sub-sectors (2017)Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data (2016)Destination branding: Opportunities and new challenges (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2015Frascati Manual 20151,129 cited
  • 2005Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research979 cited
  • 2018Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries273 cited
  • 2016Frascati manual 2015 : guidelines for collecting and reporting data in research and experimental development: the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities.213 cited
  • 2016Publication-Based Funding: The Norwegian Model94 cited
  • 2014Bibliometrics : Use and Abuse in the Review of Research Performance94 cited
  • 2012The growth of science and database coverage82 cited
  • 2016Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland81 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Professional standards in bibliometric research evaluation? A meta-evaluation of European assessment practice 2005–201965 cited
  • 2018The Flemish Performance-based Research Funding System: A Unique Variant of the Norwegian Model57 cited
  • 2019Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines51 cited
  • 2019Developing Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) as Data Sources for Studies of Research49 cited
  • 2021

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Journal article publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A comparison of Web of Science coverage for five European countries
41 cited
  • 2020ВІДКРИТІ ЦИФРОВІ СИСТЕМИ В ОЦІНЮВАННІ РЕЗУЛЬТАТІВ НАУКОВО-ПЕДАГОГІЧНИХ ДОСЛІДЖЕНЬ39 cited
  • 2019Identifying publications in questionable journals in the context of performance-based research funding37 cited
  • 2021Citation patterns between impact-factor and questionable journals34 cited
  • 2020Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers32 cited
  • 2019Publication counting methods for a national research evaluation exercise31 cited
  • 2019Understanding and Evaluating Research and Scholarly Publishing in the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH)26 cited
  • 2020The role of learned societies in national scholarly publishing24 cited
  • 2018Applications of, and Experiences with, the Norwegian Model in Finland23 cited
  • 2022The new knowledge production in the social sciences and in the arts and humanities in Latin America21 cited
  • 2021Tracing the context in disciplinary classifications: A bibliometric pairwise comparison of five classifications of journals in the social sciences and humanities20 cited
  • 2020Researchers publishing monographs are more productive and more local-oriented19 cited