Does Access Trump Ownership? Exploring Consumer Acceptance of Access-Based Consumption in the Case of Smartphones

Flora Poppelaars · Conny A. Bakker · J.M.L. van Engelen

57 citations0/0 files storedSustainability

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Sharing Economy and Platforms Sustainable Supply Chain Management Service and Product Innovation

Abstract

Value creation in a circular economy is based on products being returned after use. In the case of smartphones, most are never returned and tend to be kept in drawers. Smartphone access services (e.g., leasing or upgrade) have been experimented with in the Netherlands but have been largely unsuccessful. This study explores the reasons why consumers rejected these access-based smartphone services and is one of the very few to address this topic. The findings are compared with the case of car access services, which are socially better accepted, to identify potential areas for improvement. The qualitative study consists of in-depth interviews with consumers (n = 18) who either adopted and used a smartphone or car access service, or had considered a new smartphone or car but did not choose access-based consumption. The findings of this small-scale study suggest that the main reasons for the rejection of smartphone access services are a lack of awareness, misunderstanding of terms and conditions, and unsatisfactory compensation for their sacrifice of not owning. Smartphone access providers could thus clearly communicate customers’ rights and responsibilities, offer an excellent service experience (especially during repair) by taking over the burdens of ownership, and stimulate the societal logic shift from ownership to access.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 57 citations exist upstream.

References

2004Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet 2012Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing: Table 1.2014Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators 2012When is Ours Better than Mine? A Framework for Understanding and Altering Participation in Commercial Sharing Systems 1997The KJ Method: A Technique for Analyzing Data Derived from Japanese Ethnology 2014Sustainable product-service systems for clothing: exploring consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives in Finland 2015Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: motivations and barriers 2015New design challenges to widely implement ‘Sustainable Product–Service Systems’

Cited by

2022Community repair in the circular economy – fixing more than stuff 2021Consumer adoption of access‐based product‐service systems: The influence of duration of use and type of product 2021Barriers to product longevity: A review of business, product development and user perspectives 2020Predicting consumer adoption of branded subscription services: A prospect theory perspective

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.