SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Mapeando o Supremo: as posições dos ministros do STF na jurisdição constitucional (2012-2017)
8 references·2 citing·40 second hop
Mapeando o Supremo: as posições dos ministros do STF na jurisdição constitucional (2012-2017) (2018)Mapeando o Supremo: as posições dos minis…Power, Composition, and Decision Making: The Behavioral Consequences of Institutional Reform on Brazil’sSupremo Tribunal Federal (2014)Power, Composition, and Decis…How judges think in the Brazilian Supreme Court: Estimating ideal points and identifying dimensions (2014)How judges think in the Brazi…Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R (2014)Analyzing Spatial Models of C…Ideological Voting on Chile's Constitutional Tribunal: Dissent Coalitions in the Adjudication of Rights (2012)Ideological Voting on Chile's…Dissent in Iberia: The ideal points of justices on the Spanish and Portuguese Constitutional Tribunals (2012)Dissent in Iberia: The ideal …The Political (Science) Context of Judging (2003)The Political (Science) Conte…Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data (2000)Nonparametric Unfolding of Bi…Sophisticated voting and gate-keeping in the supreme court (1999)Sophisticated voting and gate…A queima dos laudos: controvérsias e reconfigurações dos saberes e direitos trans na ADI 4275 (2020)A queima dos laudos: contrové…Contextos da judicialização da política: novos elementos para um mapa teórico (2019)Contextos da judicialização d…Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999 (2002)Party Policy in Modern Democracies (2006)The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (2008)The Politics of Judicial Procedures: The Role of Public Oral Hearings in the German Constitutional Court (2016)Constitutional courts as veto players: Lessons from the United States, France and Germany (2017)Estimating Judicial Ideology (2021)A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis (1985)Scaling Roll Call Votes withwnominateinR (2011)How Are We Apart? Continuity and Change in the Structure of Ideological Disagreement in the American Public, 1980–2012 (2017)Political conflict in the reform of the Eurozone (2019)An Item Response Theory Model of Inter-Regional Collaboration for Transportation Planning in the United States (2021)On the Rationale of Group Decision-making (1948)Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting (2000)Quando a corte se divide: coalizões majoritárias mínimas no Supremo Tribunal Federal (2017)Dissent Aversion and Sequential Voting in the Brazilian Supreme Court (2019)Desafios da agenda de pesquisa empírica em psicologia da tomada de decisão judicial no Brasil (2020)The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model (1993)The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (2002)The Art of Political Manipulation, by William H. Riker (1987)Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court (1988)Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices (1989)Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals (2003)Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership (2008)Why (And When) Judges Dissent: A Theoretical And Empirical Analysis (2011)The Approximation of One Matrix by Another of Lower Rank (1936)Legislative leviathan: party government in the House (1993)Analyzing Roll Calls with Perfect Spatial Voting: France 1946-1958 (2004)Populists in Parliament: Comparing Left-Wing and Right-Wing Populism in the Netherlands (2013)Government-Opposition or Left-Right? The Institutional Determinants of Voting in Legislatures (2015)The Global expansion of judicial power (1996)Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work (2003)Explaining social behavior: more nuts and bolts for the social sciences (2008)The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America (2007)Despatologização do gênero: a politização das identidades abjetas (2012)Disorders related to sexuality and gender identity in the ICD‐11: revising the ICD‐10 classification based on current scientific evidence, best clinical practices, and human rights considerations (2016)The Rule of Law or the Rule of Politics? Harmonizing the Internal and External Views of Supreme Court Decision Making (2005)5 Judges as Members of Small Groups (2010)7 Is There a Psychology of Judging? (2010)Criatura e/ou Criador:transformações do Supremo Tribunal Federal sob a Constituição de 1988 (2016)Neither at the cutting edge nor in a patent-friendly environment: Appropriating the returns from innovation in a less developed economy (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data226 cited
  • 1999Sophisticated voting and gate-keeping in the supreme court169 cited
  • 2012Dissent in Iberia: The ideal points of justices on the Spanish and Portuguese Constitutional Tribunals133 cited
  • 2014Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R102 cited
  • 2003The Political (Science) Context of Judging59 cited
  • 2014Power, Composition, and Decision Making: The Behavioral Consequences of Institutional Reform on Brazil’sSupremo Tribunal Federal44 cited
  • 2014How judges think in the Brazilian Supreme Court: Estimating ideal points and identifying dimensions32 cited
  • 2012Ideological Voting on Chile's Constitutional Tribunal: Dissent Coalitions in the Adjudication of Rights20 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Contextos da judicialização da política: novos elementos para um mapa teórico13 cited
  • 2020A queima dos laudos: controvérsias e reconfigurações dos saberes e direitos trans na ADI 427512 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work