References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2005Psychophysiological and vocal measures in the detection of guilty knowledge102 cited
• 2002Assessment of the commonsense psychology underlying Daubert: Legal decision makers' abilities to evaluate expert evidence in hostile work environment cases.46 cited
• 2011If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony39 cited
• 2005Judicial Application of Daubert to Psychological Syndrome and Profile Evidence: A Research Note.39 cited
• 2014Psychological science’s replicability crisis and what it means for science in the courtroom.35 cited
• 2009The gatekeeper effect: The impact of judges' admissibility decisions on the persuasiveness of expert testimony.34 cited
• 1997Expert testimony in child sexual abuse trials: the admissibility of psychological science32 cited
• 2005The Perils of Relying on Interested Parties to Evaluate Scientific Quality27 cited
• 2009Comparison of simulated human dermal bitemarks possessing three-dimensional attributes to suspected biters using a proprietary three-dimensional comparison24 cited
• 2016Inconsistency in opinions of forensic odontologists when considering bite mark evidence21 cited
• 2006The judicial view of bitemarks within the United States Criminal Justice System.20 cited
• 2006Questions About Forensic Science14 cited