SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Development and applications of the single-case design risk of bias tool for evaluating single-case design research study reports
15 references·10 citing·28 second hop
Development and applications of the single-case design risk of bias tool for evaluating single-case design research study reports (2018)Development and applications of the singl…The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)The Handbook of Research Synt…Visual Analysis of Graphic Data (2018)Visual Analysis of Graphic Da…CEC’s Standards for Classifying the Evidence Base of Practices in Special Education (2014)CEC’s Standards for Classifyi…Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs andn-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias inN-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale (2013)Revision of a method quality …Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Single-Case Intervention Research Design Standards (2012)Single-Case Intervention Rese…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education (2005)The Use of Single-Subject Res…Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (1983)Single-case research designs:…Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings (1982)Single-Case Research Designs:…Commercial AI-Based Mental Health Chatbots as Low-Intensity Adjuncts to Psychotherapy: Effectiveness, Adherence, and Safety – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2026)Commercial AI-Based Mental He…Promoting self‐determination of persons with severe or profound intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2023)Promoting self‐determination …Self-management interventions for reducing challenging behaviors among school-age students: A systematic review (2022)Self-management interventions…Rethinking Rigor in Multiple Baseline and Multiple Probe Designs (2022)Rethinking Rigor in Multiple …Interventions Designed to Improve Narrative Language in School-Age Children: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses (2021)Interventions Designed to Imp…Commentary on the What Works Clearinghouse Standards and Procedures Handbook (v. 4.1) for the Review of Single-Case Research (2021)Commentary on the What Works …From Boulder to Stockholm in 70 Years: Single Case Experimental Designs in Clinical Research (2020)From Boulder to Stockholm in …Estimating the Impact of Design Standards on the Rigor of a Subset of Single-Case Research (2020)Estimating the Impact of Desi…An Algorithm to Evaluate Methodological Rigor and Risk of Bias in Single-Case Studies (2019)An Algorithm to Evaluate Meth…Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research via Multilevel Models: Fundamental Concepts and Methodological Considerations (2018)Meta-Analysis of Single-Case …Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (1998)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research (2010)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change (1976)SOCIAL VALIDITY: THE CASE FOR SUBJECTIVE MEASUREMENT or HOW APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IS FINDING ITS HEART 1 (1978)Defining empirically supported therapies. (1998)A Meta-Analysis of Video Modeling and Video Self-Modeling Interventions for Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders (2007)An Improved Effect Size for Single-Case Research: Nonoverlap of All Pairs (2008)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Combining Nonoverlap and Trend for Single-Case Research: Tau-U (2011)Research Methods in Psychology (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
  • 2019The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis4,525 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
  • 2005The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education3,353 cited
  • 1982Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings2,852 cited
  • 1983Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings2,677 cited
  • 2012Single-Case Intervention Research Design Standards1,325 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2014CEC’s Standards for Classifying the Evidence Base of Practices in Special Education362 cited
  • 2013Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs andn-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias inN-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

356 cited
  • 2018Visual Analysis of Graphic Data268 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Interventions Designed to Improve Narrative Language in School-Age Children: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses60 cited
    • 2021Commentary on the What Works Clearinghouse Standards and Procedures Handbook (v. 4.1) for the Review of Single-Case Research58 cited
    • 2020From Boulder to Stockholm in 70 Years: Single Case Experimental Designs in Clinical Research58 cited
    • 2023Promoting self‐determination of persons with severe or profound intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta‐analysis56 cited
    • 2018Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research via Multilevel Models: Fundamental Concepts and Methodological Considerations47 cited
    • 2022Self-management interventions for reducing challenging behaviors among school-age students: A systematic review43 cited
    • 2022Rethinking Rigor in Multiple Baseline and Multiple Probe Designs39 cited
    • 2019An Algorithm to Evaluate Methodological Rigor and Risk of Bias in Single-Case Studies32 cited
    • 2020Estimating the Impact of Design Standards on the Rigor of a Subset of Single-Case Research12 cited
    • 2026Commercial AI-Based Mental Health Chatbots as Low-Intensity Adjuncts to Psychotherapy: Effectiveness, Adherence, and Safety – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis3 cited