Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Who and why do researchers opt to publish in post-publication peer review platforms? - findings from a review and survey of F1000 Research

5 references·4 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1999Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial415 cited
2017Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers243 cited
2018Altmetric Scores, Citations, and Publication of Studies Posted as Preprints109 cited
2015An Open Science Peer Review Oath36 cited
2016Towards an open science publishing platform34 cited

Cited by

2023The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review23 cited
2024Additional experiments required: A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review23 cited
2023Perspectives on systematic review protocol registration: a survey amongst stakeholders in the clinical research publication process17 cited
2025International initiatives to enhance awareness and uptake of open research in psychology: a systematic mapping review8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work