SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A cost‐based approach for calculating royalties for standard‐essential patents (SEPs)
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
A cost‐based approach for calculating royalties for standard‐essential patents (SEPs) (2018)A cost‐based approach for calculating roy…Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (2017)Horngren's Cost Accounting: A…Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking (2016)Patent Holdup and Royalty Sta…THE MEANING OF FRAND, PART II: INJUNCTIONS (2015)THE MEANING OF FRAND, PART II…Standard-Essential Patents (2015)Standard-Essential PatentsLevelized Product Cost: Concept and Decision Relevance (2014)Levelized Product Cost: Conce…THE MEANING OF FRAND, PART I: ROYALTIES (2013)THE MEANING OF FRAND, PART I:…AN ECONOMIC INTERPRETATION OF FRAND (2013)AN ECONOMIC INTERPRETATION OF…Patent valuation : improving decision making through analysis (2012)Patent valuation : improving …The London Agreement and the cost of patenting in Europe (2009)The London Agreement and the …Can Standard-Setting Lead to Exploitative Abuse? A Dissonant View on Patent Hold-Up, Royalty Stacking and the Meaning of Frand (2007)Can Standard-Setting Lead to …Intellectual Property: Valuation, Exploitation, and Infringement Damages (2005)Intellectual Property: Valuat…Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office (2001)Rational Ignorance at the Pat…Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment (1980)Managerial Accounting: Creati…THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS AND THE SELECTION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS IN STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND CAPITAL BUDGETS**This paper is another in a series of interrelated theoretical and statistical studies of corporate financial and investment policies being made under grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, and more recently the Ford Foundation, to the Harvard Business School. The generous support for this work is most gratefully acknowledged. The author is also much indebted to his colleagues Professors Bishop, Christenson, Kahr, Raiffa, and (especially) Schlaifer, for extensive discussion and commentary on an earlier draft of this paper; but responsibility for any errors or imperfections remains strictly his own.[Professor Sharpe's paper, “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk” (Journal of Finance, September 1964) appeared after this paper was in final form and on its way to the printers. My first section, which parallels the first half of his paper (with corresponding conclusions), sets the algebraic framework for sections II, III and VI, (which have no counterpart in his paper) and for section IV on the equilibrium prices of risk assets, concerning which our results differ significantly for reasons which will be explored elsewhere. Sharpe does not take up the capital budgeting problem developed in section V below.] (1975)THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS …The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets (1965)The Valuation of Risk Assets …A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis (1963)A Simplified Model for Portfo…The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment (1958)Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares (1961)The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities (1973)Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds (1993)On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance (1997)The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment (2008)Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments (1959)THE PERFORMANCE OF MUTUAL FUNDS IN THE PERIOD 1945–1964 (1968)The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information (2003)The Bargaining Problem (1950)Efficient Patent Pools (2004)Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard-Setting Organizations (2008)Market Failures and Public Policy (2015)Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center Database (2017)Publishing, patenting, and standardization: Motives and barriers of scientists (2018)The Rate of Obsolescence Of Knowledge, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources (1979)The Economics of the European Patent System (2007)A policy insight into the R&D–patent relationship (2009)Economic incongruities in the European patent system (2011)A quality index for patent systems (2012)THE ROLE OF FEES IN PATENT SYSTEMS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE (2012)Management accounting practices in selected Asian countries (2004)A Review of Activity-Based Costing: Technique, Implementation, and Consequences (2006)The effect of organizational life cycle stage on the use of activity-based costing (2008)INNOVATION CYCLES AND LEARNING AT THE PATENT OFFICE: DOES THE EARLY PATENT GET THE DELAY?* (2010)The Market for Technology (2010)Do applicant patent citations matter? (2013)Open Innovation: Where We've Been and Where We're Going (2012)How Do Patents Affect Follow-On Innovation? Evidence from the Human Genome (2019)What Is a Patent Worth? Evidence from the U.S. Patent “Lottery” (2019)Effects of revenue management on perceived value, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty (2022)Integrating ESG into the Accounting Curriculum: Insights from Accounting Educators (2023)The role of risk management orientation and the planning function of budgeting in enhancing organizational resilience and its effect on competitive advantages during times of crises (2024)The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns (1992)Selling ideas: the determinants of patent value in an auction environment (2008)Assessing the value of China's patented inventions (2021)Qualitative and quantitative patent valuation methods: A systematic literature review (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1965The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets7,600 cited
  • 1975THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS AND THE SELECTION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS IN STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND CAPITAL BUDGETS**This paper is another in a series of interrelated theoretical and statistical studies of corporate financial and investment policies being made under grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, and more recently the Ford Foundation, to the Harvard Business School. The generous support for this work is most gratefully acknowledged. The author is also much indebted to his colleagues Professors Bishop, Christenson, Kahr, Raiffa, and (especially) Schlaifer, for extensive discussion and commentary on an earlier draft of this paper; but responsibility for any errors or imperfections remains strictly his own.[Professor Sharpe's paper, “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk” (Journal of Finance, September 1964) appeared after this paper was in final form and on its way to the printers. My first section, which parallels the first half of his paper (with corresponding conclusions), sets the algebraic framework for sections II, III and VI, (which have no counterpart in his paper) and for section IV on the equilibrium prices of risk assets, concerning which our results differ significantly for reasons which will be explored elsewhere. Sharpe does not take up the capital budgeting problem developed in section V below.]6,743 cited
  • 1963A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis2,740 cited
  • 2001Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office376 cited
  • 2016Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking311 cited
  • 2015Standard-Essential Patents230 cited
  • 1980Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment222 cited
  • 2005Intellectual Property: Valuation, Exploitation, and Infringement Damages145 cited
  • 2017Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis124 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2009The London Agreement and the cost of patenting in Europe95 cited
  • 2013THE MEANING OF FRAND, PART I: ROYALTIES63 cited
  • 2013AN ECONOMIC INTERPRETATION OF FRAND47 cited
  • 2007Can Standard-Setting Lead to Exploitative Abuse? A Dissonant View on Patent Hold-Up, Royalty Stacking and the Meaning of Frand46 cited
  • 2014Levelized Product Cost: Concept and Decision Relevance41 cited
  • 2015THE MEANING OF FRAND, PART II: INJUNCTIONS32 cited
  • 2012Patent valuation : improving decision making through analysis30 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.