SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating the quality of medical evidence in real‐world contexts
10 references·1 citing·55 second hop
Evaluating the quality of medical evidence in real‐world contexts (2018)Evaluating the quality of medical evidenc…Philosophers on drugs (2017)Philosophers on drugsThe development and validation of a meta-tool for quality appraisal of public health evidence: Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT) (2016)The development and validatio…Mechanisms and the Evidence Hierarchy (2013)Mechanisms and the Evidence H…Down with the Hierarchies (2013)Down with the HierarchiesIs meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence? (2011)Is meta-analysis the platinum…Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (2008)Practice Guideline for the Tr…Interpreting Causality in the Health Sciences (2007)Interpreting Causality in the…Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses: Table 1 (2003)Evidence, hierarchies, and ty…Guidelines for reading literature reviews. (1988)Guidelines for reading litera…On the Application of Inductive Logic (1947)On the Application of Inducti…Mismatches in the production of a scoping review: Highlighting the interplay of (in)formalities (2019)Mismatches in the production …A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. (1992)Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research (1995)Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. (2015)Thinking about Mechanisms (2000)What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences (2011)Repertoires: A post-Kuhnian perspective on scientific change and collaborative research (2016)An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine (2018)Mechanisms in Science (2019)Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: a critical review (2020)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement (2012)Evidence-based clinical practice: Overview of threats to the validity of evidence and how to minimise them (2016)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge (2024)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)An evidence assessment tool for ecosystem services and conservation studies (2016)What’s in a gold standard? In defence of randomised controlled trials (2017)What is mechanistic evidence, and why do we need it for evidence-based policy? (2018)Causality and explanation (1998)Causality and Explanation (1998)On the Mode of the Communication of Cholera (2008)The New Mechanical Philosophy (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review (2011)A standardised, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies: the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) (2015)Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design (2018)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Does Physician Retirement Affect Patients? A Systematic Review (2019)Determinants of seasonal influenza vaccination hesitancy among healthcare personnel: An integrative review (2021)Barriers and facilitators to participation in electronic health interventions in older adults with cognitive impairment: an umbrella review (2024)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)Knowledge in a Social World (1999)Evidence-based Policy (2006)In defense of meta-analysis (2018)The feasibility and malleability of EBM+ (2020)Evidence-based Medicine and Mechanistic Evidence: The Case of the Failed Rollout of Efavirenz in Zimbabwe (2023)Reason and emotion in psychotherapy (1962)The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (1989)The PHQ-9 (2001)Obsessive-compulsive disorder (2009)Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders (2014)Obsessive–compulsive disorder (2019)Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences (2009)The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clarifications. (2012)Homo Ignorans (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder1,028 cited
  • 2007Interpreting Causality in the Health Sciences548 cited
  • 2003Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses: Table 1540 cited
  • 1988Guidelines for reading literature reviews.492 cited
  • 2013Mechanisms and the Evidence Hierarchy253 cited
  • 1947On the Application of Inductive Logic200 cited
  • 2011Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?193 cited
  • 2016The development and validation of a meta-tool for quality appraisal of public health evidence: Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT)90 cited
  • 2013Down with the Hierarchies87 cited
  • 2017Philosophers on drugs39 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Mismatches in the production of a scoping review: Highlighting the interplay of (in)formalities12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work