A Comparison of Group Contingencies for Increasing Spelling Performance Among Sixth Grade Students

Abstract

The effects of independent, interdependent, and dependent group contingencies in increasing spelling performance of two classes of sixth-grade students were compared using an alternating treatments design. Results suggest that all three contingencies substantially improved spelling performance on daily tests. Differences in effectiveness between the contingencies were not consistent throughout the treatment period. Acceptability ratings by the students suggested preference for the independent contingency over either the interdependent or dependent contingency. Possible reasons for these findings and implications for future research are discussed.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 56 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.