SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Interventions
16 references·3 citing·40 second hop
Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Interventions (2018)Appraising the Quality of Systematic Revi…ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research (2020)ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes…Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Living systematic reviews: 2.…Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Living systematic review: 1. …RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials (2015)RobotReviewer: evaluation of …ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility (2013)PROSPERO at one year: an eval…Association of Study Quality with Completeness of Reporting: Have Completeness of Reporting and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Major Radiology Journals Changed Since Publication of the PRISMA Statement? (2013)Association of Study Quality …The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…How Can We Support the Use of Systematic Reviews in Policymaking? (2009)How Can We Support the Use of…AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)AMSTAR is a reliable and vali…External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) (2007)External Validation of a Meas…A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature (2005)A systematic evaluation of th…Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation (2000)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…TFOS Lifestyle - Evidence quality report: Advancing the evaluation and synthesis of research evidence (2023)TFOS Lifestyle - Evidence qua…Cochrane Eyes and Vision: a perspective introducing Cochrane Corner in Eye (2019)Cochrane Eyes and Vision: a p…Crowdsourcing critical appraisal of research evidence (CrowdCARE) was found to be a valid approach to assessing clinical research quality (2018)Crowdsourcing critical apprai…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Religion/spirituality and adolescent health outcomes: a review (2006)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Child maltreatment prevention: a systematic review of reviews (2009)Online Prevention Aimed at Lifestyle Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Reviews (2013)Covidence and Rayyan (2018)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions (2017)Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies (2019)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting (2018)Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts (2023)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews (2020)How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review (2014)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
  • 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
  • 2017Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how652 cited
  • 2007External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)569 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
  • 2017Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort354 cited
  • 2015RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials316 cited
  • 2000Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation263 cited
  • 2009How Can We Support the Use of Systematic Reviews in Policymaking?246 cited
  • 2020ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research189 cited
  • 2013PROSPERO at one year: an evaluation of its utility

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

188 cited
  • 2013Association of Study Quality with Completeness of Reporting: Have Completeness of Reporting and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Major Radiology Journals Changed Since Publication of the PRISMA Statement?146 cited
  • 2005A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature142 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023TFOS Lifestyle - Evidence quality report: Advancing the evaluation and synthesis of research evidence18 cited
    • 2018Crowdsourcing critical appraisal of research evidence (CrowdCARE) was found to be a valid approach to assessing clinical research quality15 cited
    • 2019Cochrane Eyes and Vision: a perspective introducing Cochrane Corner in Eye9 cited