SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic fabrication of scientific images revealed
3 references·10 citing·41 second hop
Systematic fabrication of scientific images revealed (2018)Systematic fabrication of scientific imag…Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: the Molecular and Cellular Biology Experience (2018)Analysis and Correction of In…The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)The Prevalence of Inappropria…Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethical Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Manipulation of Scientific Digital Images (2010)Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethi…Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences (2025)Citation Contamination by Pap…Unveiling scientific articles from paper mills with provenance analysis (2024)Unveiling scientific articles…How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem (2024)How to fight fake papers: a r…Five problems plaguing publishing in the life sciences—and one common cause (2024)Five problems plaguing publis…Readership Awareness Series – Paper 3: Paper Mills (2023)Readership Awareness Series –…Paper mills: a novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology (2023)Paper mills: a novel form of …From plagiarism to scientific paper mills: a profile of retracted articles within the SciELO Brazil collection (2022)From plagiarism to scientific…Fake data, paper mills, and their authors: The International Journal of Cancer reacts to this threat to scientific integrity (2021)Fake data, paper mills, and t…Abuse of ORCID’s weaknesses by authors who use paper mills (2021)Abuse of ORCID’s weaknesses b…Flagging incorrect nucleotide sequence reagents in biomedical papers: To what extent does the leading publication format impede automatic error detection? (2020)Flagging incorrect nucleotide…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)On the use of blockchain-based mechanisms to tackle academic misconduct (2019)Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors (2021)The indexation of retracted literature in seven principal scholarly databases: a coverage comparison of dimensions, OpenAlex, PubMed, Scilit, Scopus, The Lens and Web of Science (2024)Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)How Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology deals with fraudulent papers from paper mills (2021)The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)Verification of nucleotide sequence reagent identities in original publications in high impact factor cancer research journals (2024)Publish or impoverish (2017)Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Is Mandatory ORCID a Violation of an Author’s Freedoms and Rights? (2021)Identifying fabricated networks within authorship-for-sale enterprises (2024)The Normative Structure of Science (1973)Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science (2012)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Detection of fake papers in the era of artificial intelligence (2023)Wakefield's article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent (2011)Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies (2015)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)An extra pair of eyes: adopting innovative approaches to detect integrity issues in Naunyn–Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology (2025)Authors must follow the editorial guidelines on the use of large language models in review papers (2025)Open science and transparency are our strongest tools in the fight against fraudulent publishing activities (2025)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Hyperprolific authorship: Unveiling the extent of extreme publishing in the ‘publish or perish’ era (2025)THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES (2012)Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Quantifying new threats to health and biomedical literature integrity from rapidly scaled publications and problematic research (2026)The Handbook of Journal Publishing (2013)Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions (2019)Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications287 cited
  • 2010Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethical Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Manipulation of Scientific Digital Images185 cited
  • 2018Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: the Molecular and Cellular Biology Experience55 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Fake data, paper mills, and their authors: The International Journal of Cancer reacts to this threat to scientific integrity35 cited
  • 2023Paper mills: a novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology29 cited
  • 2021Abuse of ORCID’s weaknesses by authors who use paper mills27 cited
  • 2025Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences25 cited
  • 2024How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem25 cited
  • 2024Five problems plaguing publishing in the life sciences—and one common cause18 cited
  • 2024Unveiling scientific articles from paper mills with provenance analysis16 cited
  • 2022From plagiarism to scientific paper mills: a profile of retracted articles within the SciELO Brazil collection15 cited
  • 2023Readership Awareness Series – Paper 3: Paper Mills9 cited
  • 2020Flagging incorrect nucleotide sequence reagents in biomedical papers: To what extent does the leading publication format impede automatic error detection?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

6 cited