SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating the Completeness of ClinicalTrials.gov
4 references·0 citing·23 second hopsampled
Evaluating the Completeness of ClinicalTrials.gov (2018)Evaluating the Completeness of ClinicalTr…Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established (2017)Update on Trial Registration …Association between trial registration and positive study findings: cross sectional study (Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials—ESORT) (2017)Association between trial reg…Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study (2016)Association between trial reg…Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches? (2014)Searching ClinicalTrials.gov …From Mexico to Mali: four years in the history of clinical trial registration (2009)The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials (2011)Evaluating adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' policy of mandatory, timely clinical trial registration (2013)Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review (2017)Systematic review identifies six metrics and one method for assessing literature search effectiveness but no consensus on appropriate use (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Predicting Violent Behavior: What Can Neuroscience Add? (2017)Avoidable waste of research related to outcome planning and reporting in clinical trials (2018)Study Preregistration: An Evaluation of a Method for Transparent Reporting (2020)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)How to avoid common problems when using ClinicalTrials.gov in research: 10 issues to consider (2018)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012)Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics (2018)A systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies to promote vaccination uptake (2024)Improving the transparency and reliability of observational studies through registration (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2017Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established240 cited
  • 2014Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches?75 cited
  • 2016Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study72 cited
  • 2017Association between trial registration and positive study findings: cross sectional study (Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials—ESORT)51 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work