SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Guidance was developed on how to write a plain language summary for diagnostic test accuracy reviews
4 references·0 citing·20 second hop
Guidance was developed on how to write a plain language summary for diagnostic test accuracy reviews (2018)Guidance was developed on how to write a …A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies (2013)A systematic review classifie…A qualitative study into the difficulties experienced by healthcare decision makers when reading a Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy review (2013)A qualitative study into the …Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008)Systematic Reviews of Diagnos…Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways (2006)Comparative accuracy: assessi…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis (2015)A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (1983)Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials (2012)GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy (2020)QUADAS-C: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2021)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)How depressed is “depressed”? A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of optimal cut points for the Beck Depression Inventory revised (BDI-II) (2018)Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review (2018)Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update (2019)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)How much do you need: a randomised experiment of whether readers can understand the key messages from summaries of Cochrane Reviews without reading the full review (2014)Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study (2014)Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy1,124 cited
  • 2006Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways459 cited
  • 2013A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies283 cited
  • 2013A qualitative study into the difficulties experienced by healthcare decision makers when reading a Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy review24 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work