SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quantifying and presenting overall evidence in network meta‐analysis
16 references·1 citing·30 second hop
Quantifying and presenting overall evidence in network meta‐analysis (2018)Quantifying and presenting overall eviden…The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)The Handbook of Research Synt…The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)The PRISMA Extension Statemen…Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods (2015)Ranking treatments in frequen…Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)Graphical Tools for Network M…Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis (2013)Demystifying trial networks a…Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis (2013)Conceptual and Technical Chal…Network meta‐analysis, electrical networks and graph theory (2012)Network meta‐analysis, electr…Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)Indirect and mixed‐treatment …Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Graphical methods and numeric…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons (2006)Assessing Evidence Inconsiste…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Quantifying heterogeneity in …Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (2002)Network meta‐analysis for ind…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-…Bias propagation in network meta‐analysis models (2022)Bias propagation in network m…Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (1998)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples (2017)Comparative effects of pharmacological interventions for the acute and long-term management of insomnia disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2022)netmeta : An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods (2023)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2015The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations8,248 cited
  • 1986Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.4,785 cited
  • 2019The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis4,525 cited
  • 2010Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial3,764 cited
  • 2013Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA2,473 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
  • 2015Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods1,725 cited
  • 2012Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool1,722 cited
  • 2002Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons1,204 cited
  • 2013Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis1,071 cited
  • 2006

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons
755 cited
  • 2013Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis742 cited
  • 2012Network meta‐analysis, electrical networks and graph theory728 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Bias propagation in network meta‐analysis models11 cited