Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas.

Kelsey S. Henderson · Lora M Levett

62 citations0/0 files storedLaw and Human Behavior

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Deception detection and forensic psychology Jury Decision Making Processes Psychology of Social Influence

Abstract

= 58%). Overall, findings suggest that innocent individuals may be more vulnerable to the effects of social influence when considering advice from an advocate compared with guilty individuals. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 62 citations exist upstream.

References

1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data 2007G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences 2011Making sense of Cronbach's alpha 2004Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity 1956Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.1974Obedience to Authority 1979Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce 2001Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research

Cited by

2021The disappearing trial: how social scientists can help save the jury from extinction

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.