Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Was it a good idea to combine the studies? Why clinicians should care about heterogeneity when making decisions based on systematic reviews

4 references·1 citing·22 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
2011Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials7,681 cited
1994Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated1,016 cited
2011Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration810 cited

Cited by

2019Should this systematic review and meta-analysis change my practice? Part 2: exploring the role of the comparator, diversity, risk of bias and confidence9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work