SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Protocol for a scoping review to support development of a CONSORT extension for randomised controlled trials using cohorts and routinely collected health data
13 references·2 citing·38 second hop
Protocol for a scoping review to support development of a CONSORT extension for randomised controlled trials using cohorts and routinely collected health data (2018)Protocol for a scoping review to support …Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data (2018)Protocol for the development …PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement (2015)The REporting of studies Cond…Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it? (2015)Delphi methodology in health …Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)Evidence summaries: the evolu…How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge (2010)How to improve R&D productivi…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)A catalogue of reporting guid…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Reporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 4 - reporting of randomised controlled trials conducted using routinely collected electronic records – room for improvement (2021)Reporting transparency and co…Reporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 3 – trials conducted using administrative databases do not adequately report elements related to use of databases (2021)Reporting transparency and co…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis (2020)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE) (2018)Association of Surgeon-Patient Sex Concordance With Postoperative Outcomes (2021)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force (2022)A Proof for the Queuing Formula: L = λ W (1961)The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement (1984)Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? (2004)Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency (2012)Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs (2016)Estimated Research and Development Investment Needed to Bring a New Medicine to Market, 2009-2018 (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 2015The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement5,686 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2010How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge3,562 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2012Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach1,232 cited
  • 2009A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research1,047 cited
  • 2015Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it?747 cited
  • 2018Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data38 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021Reporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 3 – trials conducted using administrative databases do not adequately report elements related to use of databases9 cited
  • 2021Reporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 4 - reporting of randomised controlled trials conducted using routinely collected electronic records – room for improvement8 cited