SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Can’t bibliometric analysts do better? How quality assessment without field expertise does not work
13 references·0 citing·29 second hop
Can’t bibliometric analysts do better? How quality assessment without field expertise does not work (2018)Can’t bibliometric analysts do better? Ho…Comparisons of content and scientific quality indicators across peer-reviewed journal articles with more or less gender perspective: gender studies can do better (2018)Comparisons of content and sc…Rethinking bibliometric data concerning gender studies: a response to Söderlund and Madison (2015)Rethinking bibliometric data …Characteristics of gender studies publications: a bibliometric analysis based on a Swedish population database (2015)Characteristics of gender stu…Feminist Studies: A Guide to Intersectional Theory, Methodology and Writing (2010)Feminist Studies: A Guide to …Feminist Studies (2010)Feminist StudiesBibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfall…Real Science (2000)Real ScienceReal science what it is, and what it means (2000)Real science what it is, and …Handbook of qualitative research (1999)Handbook of qualitative resea…Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)Handbook of Qualitative Resea…The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1975)The Sociology of Science. The…The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Sociology of Science: The…The sociology of science (1973)The sociology of scienceThe Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques (2017)Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements (2023)Gender and innovation: state of the art and a research agenda (2013)Intersectionality as a Useful Tool (2013)Unsafe Travel: Experiencing Intersectionality and Feminist Displacements (2013)A glossary for social epidemiology (2001)What “ideas‐about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community (2003)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry (2000)Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come (2004)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)A Family Resemblance Approach to the Nature of Science for Science Education (2010)Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations (2012)New Directions for Nature of Science Research (2013)Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay (1984)Intersectionality as buzzword (2008)Why We Disagree about Climate Change (2009)The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (1993)What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge (1998)Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere (2012)Discrimination and Health Inequities (2014)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Thematic Analysis (2017)The Theory and Praxis of Intersectionality in Work and Organisations: Where Do We Go From Here? (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Handbook of Qualitative Research26,587 cited
  • 1999Handbook of qualitative research9,036 cited
  • 1974The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations4,004 cited
  • 1973The sociology of science1,637 cited
  • 1975The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations1,305 cited
  • 2005Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities886 cited
  • 2000Real science what it is, and what it means763 cited
  • 2000Real Science761 cited
  • 2010Feminist Studies: A Guide to Intersectional Theory, Methodology and Writing426 cited
  • 2010Feminist Studies376 cited
  • 2015Characteristics of gender studies publications: a bibliometric analysis based on a Swedish population database38 cited
  • 2018Comparisons of content and scientific quality indicators across peer-reviewed journal articles with more or less gender perspective: gender studies can do better10 cited
  • 2015Rethinking bibliometric data concerning gender studies: a response to Söderlund and Madison9 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work