SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Tide of lies
0 references·4 citing·19 second hop
Tide of lies (2018)Tide of liesThe Controversy behind the Controversies: Scientific Discourse in the Twenty-First Century (2025)The Controversy behind the Co…Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better? (2024)Publication integrity: what i…Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Over-optimization of academic…Assessing and Raising Concerns About Duplicate Publication, Authorship Transgressions and Data Errors in a Body of Preclinical Research (2019)Assessing and Raising Concern…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Misinformation in and about science (2021)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature (2014)Research Misconduct Identified by the US Food and Drug Administration (2015)Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials (2016)Correcting the scientific record – A broken system? (2020)How bibliometrics and school rankings reward unreliable science (2023)What do Retraction Notices Reveal About Institutional Investigations into Allegations Underlying Retractions? (2023)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Paying peer reviewers: benefits, risks, and challenges (2026)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2019Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action415 cited
  • 2024Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better?25 cited
  • 2019Assessing and Raising Concerns About Duplicate Publication, Authorship Transgressions and Data Errors in a Body of Preclinical Research24 cited
  • 2025The Controversy behind the Controversies: Scientific Discourse in the Twenty-First Century5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work