Medical school research ranking is associated with gender inequality in MSTP application rates

Caitlin J. Bowen · Calvin J. Kersbergen · Olive Tang · Andrea L. Cox · Mary Catherine Beach

17 citations0/0 files storedBMC Medical Education

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Diversity and Career in Medicine Career Development and Diversity Medical Education and Admissions

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of female trainees in MD and biomedical PhD programs has reached near parity with their male counterparts for several years. However, a gender disparity persists for enrollment in Medical Scientist Research Programs (MSTPs). Several studies suggest women underestimate their abilities compared with male colleagues. If this phenomenon applies, we might expect there to be a gender disparity in applicants to MSTPs, which are typically considered more competitive compared to MD or PhD programs. In this report, we explored this hypothesis by evaluating whether female applicants who do apply to MSTP programs disproportionately apply to lower ranking programs when compared to male applicants. METHODS: For each institution, we identified their 2016 U.S. News and World Report "Best Medical Schools: Research" ranking and examined trends across rankings using linear regression models, such as relationships between the percentage of female applicants and other factors that may influence where applicants apply. RESULTS: The female applicants who do apply to MSTP programs apply disproportionately to lower ranking programs. Despite this, women seem to have the same success rate for gaining admission to MSTPs, as indicated by matriculation rates across programs, regardless of program rank. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings of gender disparity in applications to high-ranking but not low-ranking programs support prior hypotheses that under-confidence or lack of encouragement may drive this inequality. This analysis highlights the need for further systematic studies of gender differences in MSTP applicants and the relationship to career trajectories in order to improve the gender disparity that exists in academic medicine.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.

References

1990Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance.1997Gender Differences in Seff-Perceptions: Convergent Evidence from Three Measures of Accuracy and Bias 2011Sex Differences in Application, Success, and Funding Rates for NIH Extramural Programs 2004Why Do Universities Compete in the Ratings Game? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of the U.S. News and World Report College Rankings 2005Gender differences in the self-assessment of surgical residents 2006Do Rankings Matter? The Effects of U.S. News & World Report Rankings on the Admissions Process of Law Schools 2002The other physician-scientist problem: Where have all the young girls gone?1988Sex Differences in Occupational Performance Expectations

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.