SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methodology of a systematic review
8 references·16 citing·46 second hop
Methodology of a systematic review (2018)Methodology of a systematic reviewKey Steps in Conducting Systematic Reviews for Underpinning Clinical Practice Guidelines: Methodology of the European Association of Urology (2017)Key Steps in Conducting Syste…Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified (2008)Commentary: Heterogeneity in …Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and…Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study (2002)Direction and impact of langu…Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Meta-analysis: Principles and…Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Language bias in randomised c…Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale…Practical statistics for medical research (1992)Practical statistics for medi…Umbrella Reviews: Concepts, Methodological Frameworks, and Step‐by‐Step Implementation (2025)Umbrella Reviews: Concepts, M…Revolutionizing Supply Chains: Unleashing the Power of AI-Driven Intelligent Automation and Real-Time Information Flow (2025)Revolutionizing Supply Chains…Large Language Models in Systematic Review Screening: Opportunities, Challenges, and Methodological Considerations (2025)Large Language Models in Syst…Enhancing AI for citation screening in literature reviews: Improving accuracy with ensemble models (2025)Enhancing AI for citation scr…Decarbonizing road transport: A systematic literature review based on use case analysis (2025)Decarbonizing road transport:…Writing a Scientific Review Article: Comprehensive Insights for Beginners (2024)Writing a Scientific Review A…Re-Conceptualizing Vertical Subdivision Development for Sustainable, Affordable Housing Delivery (2024)Re-Conceptualizing Vertical S…Perspectivas y metodologías del desarrollo territorial: Metaanálisis de la década 2014 – 2024 (2024)Perspectivas y metodologías d…Government support for SMEs in the Fintech Era: Enhancing access to finance, survival, and performance (2024)Government support for SMEs i…Novel behaviour change frameworks for digital health interventions: A critical review (2023)Novel behaviour change framew…How to conduct more systematic reviews of agent-based models and foster theory development - Taking stock and looking ahead (2023)How to conduct more systemati…Digital Therapy: Alleviating Anxiety and Depression in Adolescent Students During COVID-19 Online Learning - A Scoping Review (2023)Digital Therapy: Alleviating …Management information systems and their impact on business decision making (2022)Management information system…Impacts of Collaborative Partnership on the Performance of Cold Supply Chains of Agriculture and Foods: Literature Review (2022)Impacts of Collaborative Part…Serie de Redacción Científica: Revisiones Sistemáticas (2021)Serie de Redacción Científica…Guidelines for developing a systematic literature review for studies related to climate change adaptation (2021)Guidelines for developing a s…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses (2009)Severe mental illness in 33 588 prisoners worldwide: systematic review and meta-regression analysis (2012)The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013 (2014)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)A meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence. (2016)What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: A multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice. (2017)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006)The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study (2009)Mortality Rates in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa and Other Eating Disorders (2011)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Metodología de una revisión sistemática (2018)A decade of systematic literature review on Airbnb: the sharing economy from a multiple stakeholder perspective (2021)The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions for ruminative thinking: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)A bibliometric analysis on the research trends of climate change effects on economic vulnerability (2022)An Assessment Approaches and Learning Outcomes in Technical and Vocational Education: A Systematic Review Using PRISMA (2022)Interdependence of halal entrepreneurship and Islamic finance for creating a strong halal ecosystem (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Emprendimiento digital en estudiantes de educación superior (2023)Enfoques de la gestión organizacional en el sector público (2023)The Distribution of Health Care Costs and Their Statistical Analysis for Economic Evaluation (1998)Quality of life: patients and doctors don't always agree: a meta-analysis (2004)Defining successful treatment outcome in depression using the PHQ-9: A comparison of methods (2010)Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems (2012)Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (2017)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses2,780 cited
  • 1997Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures2,413 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,677 cited
  • 1992Practical statistics for medical research1,659 cited
  • 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
  • 2008Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified992 cited
  • 2002Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study891 cited
  • 2017Key Steps in Conducting Systematic Reviews for Underpinning Clinical Practice Guidelines: Methodology of the European Association of Urology232 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Guidelines for developing a systematic literature review for studies related to climate change adaptation105 cited
  • 2021Serie de Redacción Científica: Revisiones Sistemáticas66 cited
  • 2025Revolutionizing Supply Chains: Unleashing the Power of AI-Driven Intelligent Automation and Real-Time Information Flow57 cited
  • 2022Management information systems and their impact on business decision making49 cited
  • 2024Government support for SMEs in the Fintech Era: Enhancing access to finance, survival, and performance36 cited
  • 2025Large Language Models in Systematic Review Screening: Opportunities, Challenges, and Methodological Considerations

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

35 cited
  • 2024Writing a Scientific Review Article: Comprehensive Insights for Beginners31 cited
  • 2022Impacts of Collaborative Partnership on the Performance of Cold Supply Chains of Agriculture and Foods: Literature Review31 cited
  • 2025Decarbonizing road transport: A systematic literature review based on use case analysis20 cited
  • 2023How to conduct more systematic reviews of agent-based models and foster theory development - Taking stock and looking ahead20 cited
  • 2023Novel behaviour change frameworks for digital health interventions: A critical review16 cited
  • 2023Digital Therapy: Alleviating Anxiety and Depression in Adolescent Students During COVID-19 Online Learning - A Scoping Review16 cited
  • 2025Umbrella Reviews: Concepts, Methodological Frameworks, and Step‐by‐Step Implementation14 cited
  • 2025Enhancing AI for citation screening in literature reviews: Improving accuracy with ensemble models10 cited
  • 2024Re-Conceptualizing Vertical Subdivision Development for Sustainable, Affordable Housing Delivery5 cited
  • 2024Perspectivas y metodologías del desarrollo territorial: Metaanálisis de la década 2014 – 20241 cited