SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
No Bad Publicity: The Bibliometric Advantage of Corrected Articles in PLOS ONE
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
No Bad Publicity: The Bibliometric Advantage of Corrected Articles in PLOS ONE (2018)No Bad Publicity: The Bibliometric Advant…Errata in Medical Publications (2014)Errata in Medical PublicationsWhy Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Why Growing Retractions Are (…The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science (2013)The Retraction Penalty: Evide…The persistence of error: a study of retracted articles on the Internet and in personal libraries (2012)The persistence of error: a s…Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine (2012)Governing knowledge in the sc…“Everything is plentiful—Except attention”. Attention data of scientific journals on social web tools (2012)“Everything is plentiful—Exce…Characterization of Published Errors in High-Impact Oncology Journals (2011)Characterization of Published…The effectiveness of the practice of correction and republication in the biomedical literature (2010)The effectiveness of the prac…Committee on publication ethics (2010)Committee on publication ethi…Altmetrics: A manifesto (2010)Altmetrics: A manifestoShould systematic reviews include searches for published errata? (2004)Should systematic reviews inc…Linking of errata: Current practices in online physical sciences journals (2003)Linking of errata: Current pr…Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. (1999)Effects of article retraction…Phenomena of Retraction (1998)Phenomena of RetractionThe effectiveness of the erratum in avoiding error propagation in physics (1995)The effectiveness of the erra…The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature (1990)The Continued Use of Retracte…The integrity of the scientific literature (1987)Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews (2011)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)The Normative Structure of Science (1973)Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations (1975)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)What Studies of Retractions Tell Us (2014)Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements (2015)Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data (2020)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015)Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research (2018)Exploratory Research (2020)Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web (2010)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Do online communities support research collaboration? (2014)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Social media presence of scholarly journals (2018)Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models (1999)The natural selection of bad science (2016)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology (2021)Social Theory and Social Structure. (1958)Toward a new economics of science (1994)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)THE MEANING OF FAILED REPLICATIONS: A REVIEW AND PROPOSAL (2015)Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey (2009)Plagiarism in Scientific Publishing (2012)Scientific Utopia (2012)Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought (2013)Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics (2014)Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Altmetrics: A manifesto481 cited
  • 2013Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign272 cited
  • 1998Phenomena of Retraction230 cited
  • 2010Committee on publication ethics201 cited
  • 2013The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science191 cited
  • 1990The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature188 cited
  • 2012Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine151 cited
  • 1999Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine.101 cited
  • 2012The persistence of error: a study of retracted articles on the Internet and in personal libraries74 cited
  • 2012“Everything is plentiful—Except attention”. Attention data of scientific journals on social web tools42 cited
  • 1995The effectiveness of the erratum in avoiding error propagation in physics42 cited
  • 2011Characterization of Published Errors in High-Impact Oncology Journals31 cited
  • 2014Errata in Medical Publications28 cited
  • 2004Should systematic reviews include searches for published errata?27 cited
  • 2010The effectiveness of the practice of correction and republication in the biomedical literature19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2003Linking of errata: Current practices in online physical sciences journals17 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.