Three Arguments to Think that Faith Does Not Entail Belief

Daniel Howard‐Snyder

31 citations0/0 files storedPacific philosophical quarterly

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Study and Philosophy of Religion Philosophy and Theoretical Science

Abstract

Abstract On doxastic theories of propositional faith, necessarily, S has faith that p only if S believes that p. On nondoxastic theories of propositional faith, it's false that, necessarily, S has faith that p only if S believes that p. In this article, I defend three arguments for nondoxastic theories of faith and I respond to published criticisms of them.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

References

2010Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 2015Roman Faith and Christian Faith 1999Faith, Freedom, and Rationality 2013Propositional faith: what it is and what it is not 2016Does Faith Entail Belief?2017Faith and steadfastness in the face of counter-evidence 200711 Audi on Nondoxastic Faith 2016Markan Faith

Cited by

2021The transformative power of accepting God's love

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.