Design Exploration of Reliably Manufacturable Materials and Structures With Applications to Negative Stiffness Metamaterials and Microstereolithography1

Abstract

One of the challenges in designing metamaterials for additive manufacturing (AM) is accounting for the differences between as-designed and as-built geometries and material properties. From a designer's perspective, these differences can lead to degradation of part and metamaterial performance, which is especially difficult to accommodate in small-lot or one-of-a-kind production. In this context, each part is unique, and therefore, extensive iteration is costly. Designers need a means of exploring the design space while simultaneously considering the reliability of additively manufacturing particular candidate designs. In this work, a design exploration approach, based on Bayesian network classifiers (BNC), is extended to incorporate manufacturing variation into the design exploration process and identify designs that reliably meet performance requirements when this variation is taken into account. The example application is the design of negative stiffness (NS) metamaterials, in which small volume fractions of NS inclusions are embedded within a host material. The resulting metamaterial or composite exhibits macroscopic mechanical stiffness and loss properties that exceed those of the base matrix material. The inclusions are fabricated with microstereolithography with features on the scale of tens of microns, but variability is observed in material properties and dimensions from specimen to specimen. This variability is measured and modeled via design, fabrication, and characterization of metrology parts. The quantified manufacturing variability is incorporated into the BNC approach as a manufacturability classifier to identify candidate designs that achieve performance targets reliably, even when manufacturing variability is taken into account.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.