SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Consultative review is worth the wait
4 references·1 citing·19 second hop
Consultative review is worth the wait (2017)Consultative review is worth the waitThe prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s (2017)The prehistory of biology pre…The eLife approach to peer review (2013)The eLife approach to peer re…End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments (2011)End the wasteful tyranny of r…A transparent black box (2010)A transparent black boxA new twist on peer review (2018)A new twist on peer reviewTransparency and accountability (2010)Transparency showcases strength of peer review (2010)Use of politeness strategies in signed open peer review (2014)Más condutas científicas uma abordagem crítico-comparativa para in-formar uma reflexão sobre o tema (2015)Collaboration in an invisible college. (1966)San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2013)Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research (2017)Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines (2019)Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences (2020)Publishing of COVID-19 preprints in peer-reviewed journals, preprinting trends, public discussion and quality issues (2022)The changing face of peer review (2014)The academic status of reviewers predicts their language use (2023)The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review (2023)Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy (2011)Bite-Size Science and Its Undesired Side Effects (2012)Publication efficiency among the higher impact factor nursing journals in 2009: A retrospective analysis (2012)Credit and Priority in Scientific Discovery: A Scientist’s Perspective (2019)Toward a Potential Solution of the Crisis in Scholarly Publishing: An Academic Research Community Alliance Model (2023)Scientific publishing without gatekeeping: an empirical investigation of eLife’s new peer review process (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s78 cited
  • 2011End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments50 cited
  • 2013The eLife approach to peer review28 cited
  • 2010A transparent black box19 cited

Cited by

  • 2018A new twist on peer review11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work