SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
204.4 Identifiers for Digital Objects: The case of software source code preservation.
1 references·5 citing·23 second hop
204.4 Identifiers for Digital Objects: The case of software source code preservation. (2018)204.4 Identifiers for Digital Objects: Th…A Framework for Software Preservation (2010)A Framework for Software Pres…Reproducible research policies and software/data management in scientific computing journals: a survey, discussion, and perspectives (2025)Reproducible research policie…Toward Long-Term and Archivable Reproducibility (2021)Toward Long-Term and Archivab…Referencing Source Code Artifacts: A Separate Concern in Software Citation (2019)Referencing Source Code Artif…Attributing and Referencing (Research) Software: Best Practices and Outlook from Inria (2019)Attributing and Referencing (…Attributing and Referencing (Research) Software: Best Practices and Outlook From Inria (2019)Attributing and Referencing (…Software in the scientific literature: Problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature (2015)Repeatability in computer systems research (2016)How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship (2019)Data citation and the citation graph (2021)Responsible Research Assessment II: A specific proposal for hiring and promotion in psychology (2022)Measuring Reproducibility in Computer Systems Research (2014)The top 100 papers (2014)Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Software Must be Recognised as an Important Output of Scholarly Research (2021)Understanding progress in software citation: a study of software citation in the CORD-19 corpus (2022)Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows (2004)Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences (2010)Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows (2016)A survey of researchers’ code sharing and code reuse practices, and assessment of interactive notebook prototypes (2022)Improving Science That Uses Code (2023)Taverna: a tool for building and running workflows of services (2006)The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update (2018)The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible, and collaborative data analyses: 2024 update (2024)Reproducible research for scientific computing: Tools and strategies for changing the culture (2012)Why workflows break — Understanding and combating decay in Taverna workflows (2012)Saving Data Journalism (2018)On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure (2019)Toward practical transparent verifiable and long-term reproducible research using Guix (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010A Framework for Software Preservation49 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Attributing and Referencing (Research) Software: Best Practices and Outlook From Inria37 cited
  • 2021Toward Long-Term and Archivable Reproducibility33 cited
  • 2019Referencing Source Code Artifacts: A Separate Concern in Software Citation19 cited
  • 2019Attributing and Referencing (Research) Software: Best Practices and Outlook from Inria19 cited
  • 2025Reproducible research policies and software/data management in scientific computing journals: a survey, discussion, and perspectives12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work