SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Beware of Predatory Journals: A Caution from Editors of Three Family Medicine Journals
8 references·1 citing·36 second hop
Beware of Predatory Journals: A Caution from Editors of Three Family Medicine Journals (2018)Beware of Predatory Journals: A Caution f…Predatory Publishing: How to Safely Navigate the Waters of Open Access (2018)Predatory Publishing: How to …Predatory Publishing - Experience with OMICS International (2017)Predatory Publishing - Experi…Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Potential predatory and legit…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…The Google Scholar Experiment: How To Index False Papers And Manipulate Bibliometric Indicators (2013)The Google Scholar Experiment…The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators (2013)The G oogle scholar experimen…The Continued Movement for Open Access to Peer-Reviewed Literature (2013)The Continued Movement for Op…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…‘At-risk articles’: the imperative to recover lost science (2020)‘At-risk articles’: the imper…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators (2014)Tourism and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis (2018)Exploratory Research (2020)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)One year of unsolicited e-mails: The modus operandi of predatory journals and publishers (2021)The Rise of Platinum Open Access Journals with Both Impact Factors and Zero Article Processing Charges (2022)Uncovering the trends and developments in subscription business models through bibliometric analysis (2023)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Stop this waste of people, animals and money (2017)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them (2020)Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals (2016)What I learned from predatory publishers (2017)Predatory Publishing and the Academic Librarian: Developing Tools to Make Decisions (2020)Open Editors: A dataset of scholarly journals’ editorial board positions (2022)Predator Effect (2022)A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review (2020)Pedagogical strategy for scholarly communication literacy and avoiding deceptive publishing practices (2023)Unsolicited solicitations: identifying characteristics of unsolicited emails from potentially predatory journals and the role of librarians (2023)A mixed-methods survey and focus group study to understand researcher and clinician preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool (2024)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The silent fading of an academic search engine: the case of Microsoft Academic Search (2014)Scholarly Metrics Baseline: A Survey of Faculty Knowledge, Use, and Opinion about Scholarly Metrics (2017)Microsoft Academic automatic document searches: Accuracy for journal articles and suitability for citation analysis (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 2017Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison384 cited
  • 2013The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators271 cited
  • 2013The Google Scholar Experiment: How To Index False Papers And Manipulate Bibliometric Indicators53 cited
  • 2017Predatory Publishing - Experience with OMICS International36 cited
  • 2013The Continued Movement for Open Access to Peer-Reviewed Literature28 cited
  • 2018Predatory Publishing: How to Safely Navigate the Waters of Open Access14 cited

Cited by

  • 2020‘At-risk articles’: the imperative to recover lost science5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work