SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The REFLECT Statement: Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in Livestock and Food Safety: Explanation and Elaboration
16 references·16 citing·24 second hopsampled
The REFLECT Statement: Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in Livestock and Food Safety: Explanation and Elaboration (2010)The REFLECT Statement: Reporting Guidelin…Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Extending the CONSORT Stateme…External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)External validity of randomis…Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Better Reporting of Harms in …Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Reported Methodologic Quality…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasA method of back-calculating the log odds ratio and standard error of the log odds ratio from the reported group-level risk of disease (2020)A method of back-calculating …Invited review: Completeness of reporting of experiments: REFLECTing on a year of animal trials in the Journal of Dairy Science (2019)Invited review: Completeness …Evidence of improved reporting of swine vaccination trials in the post-REFLECT statement publication period (2019)Evidence of improved reportin…The reporting characteristics of bovine respiratory disease clinical intervention trials published prior to and following publication of the REFLECT statement (2017)The reporting characteristics…Methods and Processes of Developing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology—Veterinary (STROBE-Vet) Statement (2016)Methods and Processes of Deve…Methods and Processes of Developing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology – Veterinary (STROBE-Vet) Statement (2016)Methods and Processes of Deve…Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2015)Research synthesis in veterin…Randomized Controlled Trials and Challenge Trials: Design and Criterion for Validity (2014)Randomized Controlled Trials …An introduction to systematic reviews in animal health, animal welfare, and food safety (2014)An introduction to systematic…Blinding terminology used in reports of randomized controlled trials involving dogs and cats (2012)Blinding terminology used in …The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestockand Food Safety (2010)The REFLECT Statement: Method…The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestock and Food Safety by Modifying the CONSORT Statement (2010)The REFLECT Statement: Method…The quality of reporting and publication status of vaccines trials presented at veterinary conferences from 1988 to 2003 (2010)The quality of reporting and …Reporting of methodological features in observational studies of pre-harvest food safety (2010)Reporting of methodological f…Reporting guidelines for primary research: Saying what you did (2010)Reporting guidelines for prim…The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestock and Food Safety (2009)The REFLECT Statement: Method…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 2005External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”2,541 cited
  • 2008Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration2,290 cited
  • 2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2,285 cited
  • 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials1,426 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2009The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestock and Food Safety82 cited
    • 2010The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestock and Food Safety by Modifying the CONSORT Statement71 cited
    • 2016Methods and Processes of Developing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology – Veterinary (STROBE-Vet) Statement60 cited
    • 2015Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis39 cited
    • 2010The quality of reporting and publication status of vaccines trials presented at veterinary conferences from 1988 to 200338 cited
    • 2019Invited review: Completeness of reporting of experiments: REFLECTing on a year of animal trials in the Journal of Dairy Science32 cited
    • 2014Randomized Controlled Trials and Challenge Trials: Design and Criterion for Validity31 cited
    • 2010Reporting guidelines for primary research: Saying what you did26 cited
    • 2014An introduction to systematic reviews in animal health, animal welfare, and food safety26 cited
    • 2016Methods and Processes of Developing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology—Veterinary (STROBE-Vet) Statement24 cited
    • 2019Evidence of improved reporting of swine vaccination trials in the post-REFLECT statement publication period23 cited
    • 2010The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestockand Food Safety21 cited
    • 2020A method of back-calculating the log odds ratio and standard error of the log odds ratio from the reported group-level risk of disease20 cited
    • 2010Reporting of methodological features in observational studies of pre-harvest food safety18 cited
    • 2012Blinding terminology used in reports of randomized controlled trials involving dogs and cats17 cited
    • 2017The reporting characteristics of bovine respiratory disease clinical intervention trials published prior to and following publication of the REFLECT statement17 cited