SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peer reviewers unmasked: largest global survey reveals trends
0 references·15 citing·44 second hop
Peer reviewers unmasked: largest global survey reveals trends (2018)Peer reviewers unmasked: largest global s…Where have all the reviewers gone? (2024)Where have all the reviewers …rworkflows: automating reproducible practices for the R community (2024)rworkflows: automating reprod…Can peer review accolade awards motivate reviewers? A large-scale quasi-natural experiment (2024)Can peer review accolade awar…Achieving Global Open Access (2024)Achieving Global Open AccessThe evolving crisis of the peer-review process (2022)The evolving crisis of the pe…Towards inclusive funding practices for early career researchers (2021)Towards inclusive funding pra…Peer-reviewing in Surgical Journals: Revolutionize or Perish? (2021)Peer-reviewing in Surgical Jo…Is a journal's ranking related to the reviewer's academic impact? (An empirical study based on Publons) (2021)Is a journal's ranking relate…Bibliodiversity at the Centre: Decolonizing Open Access (2021)Bibliodiversity at the Centre…A Theory-Practice Divide in a Museum Showcase (2021)A Theory-Practice Divide in a…We need to talk about peer-review—Experienced reviewers are not endangered species, but they need motivation (2020)We need to talk about peer-re…Towards inclusive funding practices for early career researchers (2020)Towards inclusive funding pra…Rise in higher education researchers and academic publications (2020)Rise in higher education rese…Rise in higher education researchers and academic publications (2020)Rise in higher education rese…Tackling waste in publishing through portable peer review (2018)Tackling waste in publishing …Diffusion of innovations. (2003)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Transforming Academic Journal Assessment from “Quality” to “Impact”: A Case Study of the SDG Impact Intensity Academic Journal Rating Artificial Intelligence System (2023)Rethinking the author name ambiguity problem and beyond: The case of the Chinese context (2024)Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey (2006)Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. (2014)Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal (2015)The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review (2022)Analysis of peer reviewers’ response to invitations by gender and geographical region: cohort study of manuscripts reviewed at 19 biomedical journals before and during covid-19 pandemic (2023)A Geopolitics Of Academic Writing (2002)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Open access at a crossroads: library publishing and bibliodiversity (2023)Who Counts? (2023)The journal and the quest for epistemic justice (2024)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)The Matthew effect in science funding (2018)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)Building leaders for the UN Ocean Science Decade: a guide to supporting early career women researchers within academic marine research institutions (2022)Promoting equality, diversity and inclusion in research and funding: reflections from a digital manufacturing research network (2024)Inequity, precarity, and disparity: Exploring systemic and institutional barriers in open access publishing (2025)Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment (2018)A decade of marketing analytics and more to come: JMA insights (2023)Evaluating science: A comparison of human and AI reviewers (2024)What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)Scientific literature: Information overload (2016)«I Do Not Have Time»—Is This the End of Peer Review in Public Health Sciences? (2022)Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process (2025)China statistical yearbook (1988)Digest of Education Statistics (2014)A Bibliometric Analysis of World Issues—Social, Political, Economic, and Environmental Dimensions (2022)Scoping Reviews: Expanding Methodological Approaches to Literature Reviews in Adult Education (2023)The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise (2016)Stop the peer-review treadmill. I want to get off (2023)Do you want your paper published? – Then referee others! The view from seasoned editors (2024)Artificial intelligence tools in scholarly publishing: guidance for peer reviewers (2026)Evaluation of Large Language Models for Peer Review in Transplantation Research: Algorithm Validation Study (2026)Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1978)Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 (1980)Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective (1988)Motivation Crowding Theory (2001)Self-Determination Theory (2012)Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions (2020)Fast & Fair peer review: a pilot study demonstrating feasibility of rapid, high-quality peer review in a biology journal (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2020We need to talk about peer-review—Experienced reviewers are not endangered species, but they need motivation46 cited
  • 2021Bibliodiversity at the Centre: Decolonizing Open Access46 cited
  • 2022The evolving crisis of the peer-review process38 cited
  • 2021Peer-reviewing in Surgical Journals: Revolutionize or Perish?34 cited
  • 2020Rise in higher education researchers and academic publications32 cited
  • 2021Towards inclusive funding practices for early career researchers21 cited
  • 2020Rise in higher education researchers and academic publications21 cited
  • 2024Achieving Global Open Access15 cited
  • 2024Can peer review accolade awards motivate reviewers? A large-scale quasi-natural experiment15 cited
  • 2024Where have all the reviewers gone?15 cited
  • 2018Tackling waste in publishing through portable peer review13 cited
  • 2020Towards inclusive funding practices for early career researchers9 cited
  • 2021Is a journal's ranking related to the reviewer's academic impact? (An empirical study based on Publons)8 cited
  • 2024rworkflows: automating reproducible practices for the R community6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2021
A Theory-Practice Divide in a Museum Showcase
3 cited