SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Interface Concepts for Intent Communication from Autonomous Vehicles to Vulnerable Road Users
2 references·2 citing·20 second hop
Interface Concepts for Intent Communication from Autonomous Vehicles to Vulnerable Road Users (2018)Interface Concepts for Intent Communicati…Human-Vehicle Interfaces: The Power of Vehicle Movement Gestures in Human Road User Coordination (2017)Human-Vehicle Interfaces: The…Developing Socially Acceptable Autonomous Vehicles (2016)Developing Socially Acceptabl…The Effects of Explicit Intention Communication, Conspicuous Sensors, and Pedestrian Attitude in Interactions with Automated Vehicles (2020)The Effects of Explicit Inten…Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interaction: Peril and Promise (2020)Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist In…Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings (1974)Computers, Minds and Conduct (1995)The normal natural troubles of driving with GPS (2012)The Best Rated Human–Machine Interface Design for Autonomous Vehicles in the 2016 Grand Cooperative Driving Challenge (2017)Driving Style: How Should an Automated Vehicle Behave? (2019)Gaze Patterns in Pedestrian Interaction with Vehicles (2019)The Hidden Dimension (1973)Communication of intent in assistive free flyers (2014)Will There Be New Communication Needs When Introducing Automated Vehicles to the Urban Context? (2016)AV-Pedestrian Interaction Design Using a Pedestrian Mixed Traffic Simulator (2019)Pedestrian road-crossing willingness as a function of vehicle automation, external appearance, and driving behaviour (2019)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior (2012)Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire Among 5,000 Respondents (2014)A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Applications for Automated Driving: 2009–2020 (2021)External human–machine interfaces: Gimmick or necessity? (2022)External Human–Machine Interfaces for Automated Vehicles in Shared Spaces: A Review of the Human–Computer Interaction Literature (2023)Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction (2018)Investigating pedestrian suggestions for external features on fully autonomous vehicles: A virtual reality experiment (2018)What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space? (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Human-Vehicle Interfaces: The Power of Vehicle Movement Gestures in Human Road User Coordination139 cited
  • 2016Developing Socially Acceptable Autonomous Vehicles95 cited

Cited by

  • 2020The Effects of Explicit Intention Communication, Conspicuous Sensors, and Pedestrian Attitude in Interactions with Automated Vehicles87 cited
  • 2020Autonomous Vehicle-Cyclist Interaction: Peril and Promise80 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work