Evolution of the Scientific Literature on Input–Output Analysis: A Bibliometric Analysis of 1990–2017

Yulei Xie · Ling Ji · Beibei Zhang · Guohe Huang

27 citations0/0 files storedSustainability

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Environmental Impact and Sustainability Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

This study attempts to characterize the literature related to input–output analysis between 1990–2017 through bibliometric analysis technology based on the Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index databases. By means of bibliometric tools, this paper provides deep insights on the patterns of these articles, the most influential works and authors, and the emerging research topics. The results imply that China and the United States (USA) are the leading countries in terms of publication output. The Chinese Academy of Sciences is the most productive research institution, followed by Beijing Normal University and the University of Sydney. The Journal of Cleaner Production, Ecological Economics, and Energy Policy are the top mainstream journals in the input–output analysis-related field. Based on network analysis, this paper also discovers the hidden collaboration patterns and interrelations of countries, institutions, and authors. The bibliographic coupling and keywords concurrence networks are adopted to illustrate the input–output analysis evolution over time, and identify the current key research hotspots. The obtained results will help scientific researchers better understand the research status and frontier trends in this field, permit researchers to know the current research interests in the input–output analysis field, and provide useful information for further investigation and publication strategies.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 27 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping 2005CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature 2014Visualizing Bibliometric Networks 1963Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers 1936Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States 2010Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?2005For Your Citations Only? Hot Topics in Bibliometric Analysis 2008Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic‐coupling analysis

Cited by

2019Academic Collaboration in Entrepreneurship Research from 2009 to 2018: A Multilevel Collaboration Network Analysis 2020An Overview of 25 Years of European Scientific Collaboration in the Field of Strategic Management: A Bibliometric Analysis 2023Bibliometric Analysis of Earthquake Research in America: A Comparative Study Using Web of Science and Scopus Databases 2024Trends on Gastrotricha research: a bibliometric analysis

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.