SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evidence‐based dentistry or meta‐analysis illness? A commentary on current publishing trends in the field of temporomandibular disorders and bruxism
2 references·3 citing·22 second hop
Evidence‐based dentistry or meta‐analysis illness? A commentary on current publishing trends in the field of temporomandibular disorders and bruxism (2018)Evidence‐based dentistry or meta‐analysis…New evidence pyramid (2016)New evidence pyramidWhy Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools (2023)Critical appraisal of systema…Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Relating to Performance of All‐Ceramic Implant Abutments, Frameworks, and Restorations (2020)Methodological Quality of Sys…A Descriptive Analysis of Clinical Articles Published in the Last 50 Years in the Dental Literature (2019)A Descriptive Analysis of Cli…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence (2011)Association Between Analytic Strategy and Estimates of Treatment Outcomes in Meta-analyses (2014)How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports (2018)Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction (2019)The Handbook of Behavior Change (2020)Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions (2002)Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare (2013)Recent trends in dental research in Saudi Arabia: Mapping review (2010–2020) (2022)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Use of quality assessment tools within systematic reviews in orthodontics during the last decade: looking for a threshold? (2021)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,571 cited
  • 2016New evidence pyramid1,412 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools15 cited
  • 2020Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Relating to Performance of All‐Ceramic Implant Abutments, Frameworks, and Restorations9 cited
  • 2019A Descriptive Analysis of Clinical Articles Published in the Last 50 Years in the Dental Literature6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work