SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Multilevel Graph-Based Decision Making in Big Scholarly Data: An Approach to Identify Expert Reviewer, Finding Quality Impact Factor, Ranking Journals and Researchers
16 references·0 citing·34 second hop
Multilevel Graph-Based Decision Making in Big Scholarly Data: An Approach to Identify Expert Reviewer, Finding Quality Impact Factor, Ranking Journals and Researchers (2018)Multilevel Graph-Based Decision Making in…Construction of the Literature Graph in Semantic Scholar (2018)Construction of the Literatur…Big Scholarly Data: A Survey (2017)Big Scholarly Data: A SurveyThe Number of Scholarly Documents on the Public Web (2014)The Number of Scholarly Docum…ArnetMiner (2008)ArnetMinerThe R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index (2007)The R- and AR-indices: Comple…Ranking scientific publications using a model of network traffic (2007)Ranking scientific publicatio…Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? (2006)Is it possible to compare res…A Hirsch-type index for journals (2006)A Hirsch-type index for journ…On six degrees of separation in DBLP-DB and more (2005)On six degrees of separation …Mapping the backbone of science (2005)Mapping the backbone of scien…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Impact factors: use and abuse. (2003)Impact factors: use and abuse.Diffusion of innovations. (2003)Diffusion of innovations.Analyzing Linguistic Variation: Statistical Models and Methods (2001)Analyzing Linguistic Variatio…CiteSeer (1998)CiteSeerCitation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation Analysis as a Tool i…Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations (2009)Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs (2010)Diffusion of Innovations (2015)Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology (2016)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution (1998)The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level (2007)Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research (2020)Visualizing science by citation mapping (1999)How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures (2009)Who Sees Human? (2010)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Digital libraries and autonomous citation indexing (1999)Collective entity resolution in relational data (2007)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences (2006)Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research?: A Review of Qualitative Interviews in is Research (2013)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)S2ORC: The Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus (2020)Data and code for the essay "Recording scientific progress by its content": OpenAlex article counts (2016–2026) and Science Live replication outcomes (2022)Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis (2007)What do we know about the h index? (2007)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Diffusion of innovations.13,723 cited
  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation2,781 cited
  • 2008ArnetMiner2,135 cited
  • 1998CiteSeer1,042 cited
  • 2005Mapping the backbone of science940 cited
  • 2006A Hirsch-type index for journals671 cited
  • 2007The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index561 cited
  • 2006Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?548 cited
  • 2003Impact factors: use and abuse.500 cited
  • 2018Construction of the Literature Graph in Semantic Scholar345 cited
  • 2014The Number of Scholarly Documents on the Public Web321 cited
  • 2017Big Scholarly Data: A Survey267 cited
  • 2007Ranking scientific publications using a model of network traffic241 cited
  • 2001Analyzing Linguistic Variation: Statistical Models and Methods192 cited
  • 2005On six degrees of separation in DBLP-DB and more152 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.