Publication rate of podium presentations from the orthopaedic research society annual meeting

Alex M. Hollenberg · David Nathan Bernstein · Michael-John G. Beltejar · Treyc Terry · Addisu Mesfin

13 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Orthopaedic Research®

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Writing and Publishing scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

Annual scientific meetings serve as a forum for dissemination of new research findings. Presentations should be of high scientific quality as they have the potential to impact future research projects and current clinical practice. The publication rate of podium presentations at an annual meeting can be used to assess the quality of the research presented. The purpose of this study was to determine the publication rate of podium presentations at the Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS) annual meeting. All podium presentations from the 2012 to 2014 annual ORS meetings were identified. Abstracts were categorized into an orthopaedic topic. A PubMed search was performed to determine if an abstract reached publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The publication rate was determined for each year. Of the 1063 podium presentations identified, 640 (60.2%) reached publication in a peer-reviewed journal. No significant differences were observed in the publication rate between the orthopaedic topics (p = 0.3414). The majority (75.9%) of published abstracts reached publication within 2 years of presentation and the average time to publication was 17.0 months. Abstracts were published in 151 different journals with an average impact factor of 4.46. Time to publication varied significantly by journal (p = 0.025). Journal of Orthopaedic Research, Journal of Biomechanics, PLoS ONE, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, and Bone were the most common publication journals. This study provides insight into the quality of podium presentations at the ORS annual meeting. The ORS annual meeting compares favorably to other orthopaedic surgery meetings. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:288-292, 2019.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research 1994Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis 1994Full Publication of Results Initially Presented in Abstracts 2009Publication Rates of Presentations at an Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 1999The Publication Rates of Presentations at Major Spine Specialty Society Meetings (NASS, SRS, ISSLS)2000Short report: Do presenters to paediatric meetings get their work published?1998Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the orthopaedic research society 1998Publication Rates for the Scientific Sessions of the OTA

Cited by

2020Major Orthopaedic Conference Abstract Publication: An Analysis of Abstracts Accepted for the AAOS Annual Meetings Between 2014 and 2017 2020Do We Publish What We Present? A Critical Analysis of Abstracts Presented at Three Plastic Surgery Meetings

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.