SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Case study in major quotation errors: a critical commentary on the Newcastle–Ottawa scale
15 references·14 citing·38 second hop
Case study in major quotation errors: a critical commentary on the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (2018)Case study in major quotation errors: a c…Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)Critical evaluation of the Ne…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and…Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of …Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Evaluating non-randomised int…On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions (2001)On the bias produced by quali…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…On "I Know It When I See It" (1996)On "I Know It When I See It"Quality Scores Are Useless and Potentially Misleading: Reply to “Re: A Critical Look at Some Popular Analytic Methods” (1994)Quality Scores Are Useless an…Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem (1990)Quotational and reference acc…Quotational and Reference Accuracy in Surgical Journals (1990)Quotational and Reference Acc…Do authors check their references? A survey of accuracy of references in three public health journals. (1987)Do authors check their refere…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals? (1985)How accurate are quotations a…Socioeconomic status and depression—a systematic review (2025)Socioeconomic status and depr…Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews1 (2023)Guidance to best tools and pr…Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Guidance to best tools and pr…Guidance to Best Tools and Practices for Systematic Reviews (2023)Guidance to Best Tools and Pr…Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Guidance to best tools and pr…Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Guidance to best tools and pr…Highly cited educational technology journal articles: a descriptive and critical analysis (2022)Highly cited educational tech…The household financial burden of non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review (2021)The household financial burde…Meta-Research: How problematic citing practices distort science (2021)Meta-Research: How problemati…The Matter of Facts (2020)The Matter of FactsMyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications (2020)MyCites: a proposal to mark a…Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data (2020)Continued post-retraction cit…Challenges and recommendations on the conduct of systematic reviews of observational epidemiologic studies in environmental and occupational health (2020)Challenges and recommendation…Massive citations to misleading methods and research tools: Matthew effect, quotation error and citation copying (2018)Massive citations to misleadi…Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement (2012)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Are healthcare workers’ intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? a systematic review (2013)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Bias Modelling in Evidence Synthesis (2008)RE: "SHOULD META-ANALYSES OF INTERVENTIONS INCLUDE OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES IN ADDITION TO RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS? A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES" (2009)Efficacy of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia – A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2015)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems (2012)Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (2017)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2010Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses17,378 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration10,571 cited
  • 2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies3,791 cited
  • 2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies2,905 cited
  • 2008Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses2,780 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 2001On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions359 cited
  • 1990Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem176 cited
  • 1985How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals?160 cited
  • 1994Quality Scores Are Useless and Potentially Misleading: Reply to “Re: A Critical Look at Some Popular Analytic Methods”147 cited
  • 1996On "I Know It When I See It"140 cited
  • 1990Quotational and Reference Accuracy in Surgical Journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

129 cited
  • 1987Do authors check their references? A survey of accuracy of references in three public health journals.114 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021The household financial burden of non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review151 cited
    • 2020Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data88 cited
    • 2025Socioeconomic status and depression—a systematic review60 cited
    • 2023Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews45 cited
    • 2020Challenges and recommendations on the conduct of systematic reviews of observational epidemiologic studies in environmental and occupational health36 cited
    • 2018Massive citations to misleading methods and research tools: Matthew effect, quotation error and citation copying28 cited
    • 2020The Matter of Facts22 cited
    • 2023Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews122 cited
    • 2023Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews22 cited
    • 2023Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews20 cited
    • 2021Meta-Research: How problematic citing practices distort science20 cited
    • 2020MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications18 cited
    • 2022Highly cited educational technology journal articles: a descriptive and critical analysis17 cited
    • 2023Guidance to Best Tools and Practices for Systematic Reviews17 cited