SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting Time Horizons in Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review
8 references·0 citing·35 second hop
Reporting Time Horizons in Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review (2018)Reporting Time Horizons in Randomized Con…The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus (2020)The Delphi Technique: Making …CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Association between framing of the research question using the PICOT format and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (2010)Association between framing o…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…THE DELPHI TECHNIQUE: MAKING SENSE OF CONSENSUS PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT (2007)THE DELPHI TECHNIQUE: MAKING …The Role of the Journal Impact Factor: Choosing the Optimal Source of Peer-Reviewed Plastic Surgery Information (2006)The Role of the Journal Impac…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Importance of the Lay Press in the Transmission of Medical Knowledge to the Scientific Community (1991)The Journal “Impact Factor” (1998)Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals (2002)Impact Factor, h-Index, and Alternative Metrics: How Should We Measure the Impact of Publications in Plastic Surgery? (2020)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The Role of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis in Dermatology (2012)Preparing for what the reporting checklists will not tell you: the PREPARE Trial guide for planning clinical research to avoid research waste (2017)Getting Published in Medical Education: Overcoming Barriers to Scholarly Production (2018)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)Foundations of Behavioral Research (1974)Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique (2000)Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies (2011)Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Exploring the importance of different supplier selection criteria (2013)Using an e-Delphi technique in achieving consensus across disciplines for developing best practice in day surgery in Ireland (2014)APPLICATION OF DELPHI METHOD IN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: A QUANTITATIVE PERSPECTIVE (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration10,345 cited
  • 2020The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus4,498 cited
  • 2007THE DELPHI TECHNIQUE: MAKING SENSE OF CONSENSUS PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT312 cited
  • 2010Association between framing of the research question using the PICOT format and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials119 cited
  • 2006The Role of the Journal Impact Factor: Choosing the Optimal Source of Peer-Reviewed Plastic Surgery Information15 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work