The Impact of Kinship Networks on Foster Care Children's Outcomes

Scott C. Leon · Daniel A. Dickson

27 citations0/0 files storedFamily Relations

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Child Welfare and Adoption Child Abuse and Trauma Family and Disability Support Research

Abstract

Objective To identify different kin and fictive kin network support profiles available to children in foster care and examine whether these profiles predict behavioral outcomes. Background For kids in foster care, individual‐level strengths have been shown to buffer the impact of maltreatment on negative outcomes. However, little is known about the possible benefit of kin and fictive kin networks on outcomes (e.g., internalizing symptoms and externalizing behaviors). Method This longitudinal study measured the involvement of 221 foster care children's (6–14 years of age) kin and fictive kin networks (e.g., visits, childcare, homework help, transportation). Strengths (e.g., coping, talents), maltreatment, internalizing symptoms, and externalizing behaviors were measured using the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths dataset. Results Using latent profile analysis, two kinship involvement profiles emerged: A low‐involvement profile (75.5%) and a high‐involvement profile (23.5%). The high‐involvement profile was negatively associated with internalizing symptoms trajectories but not externalizing behavior trajectories. However, this effect was moderated by child‐level strengths: Children with more strengths and in the high‐involvement profile had the best internalizing symptoms outcomes. Finally, membership in the high‐involvement profile buffered the negative impact of maltreatment on internalizing symptoms trajectories. Conclusion The presence of both child strengths and kin and fictive kin involvement is associated with better outcomes. Implications These results support efforts to promote policies and practices designed to engage kin and fictive kin networks, which is not currently a priority in child welfare.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 27 citations exist upstream.

References

1985Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.2000The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work 2001Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development.1987Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms.2001Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research.1989Vulnerable but Invincible: A Longitudinal Study of Resilient Children and Youth 2014Life-Span Development and Behavior 2013Statistical Power to Detect the Correct Number of Classes in Latent Profile Analysis

Cited by

2020Visits with fathers involved in the criminal justice system and behavioral outcomes among children in foster care

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.